Request a Demo of Tessian Today.
Automatically stop data breaches and security threats caused by employees on email. Powered by machine learning, Tessian detects anomalies in real-time, integrating seamlessly with your email environment within minutes and starting protection in a day. Provides you with unparalleled visibility into human security risks to remediate threats and ensure compliance.

Tessian Named Representative Vendor in the 2022 Gartner® Market Guide for Data Loss Prevention. Download →

Email DLP

Read our latest articles, tips and industry-specific news around Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Learn about the implications of data loss on email.

Data Exfiltration Email DLP Compliance
A Beginner’s Guide to Cybersecurity Frameworks
05 October 2020
As rates of cybersecurity incidents rise and data security laws become stricter, organizations must take steps to protect the information under its control. But safeguarding your company’s information can be a daunting task.  So, where do you start? You can start by implementing a cybersecurity framework. In this article, we’ll look at four of the most prevalent cybersecurity frameworks — to help you get started on your journey toward better information security.  But first, let’s define what a cybersecurity framework is. What is a cybersecurity framework?
What are the benefits of implementing a cybersecurity framework? Running a business is a time-consuming and complicated task and many business leaders – especially those without any background in cybersecurity – worry that implementing a cybersecurity framework will create extra work. And, while it does take time and effort to follow a cybersecurity framework through to completion, it’s almost certainly going to save you time, stress — and money — in the long-term. Here’s how: It will strengthen your network protection, reducing your risk of a cybersecurity attack. It will help ensure better data security practices among staff, reducing the risk of accidental data loss, such as via misdirected email. It increases awareness of cybersecurity among staff, leading to a reduced risk from social engineering attacks. It improves your reputation among consumers and business partners. Implementing a cybersecurity framework is also a fundamental way of meeting your legal obligations under data privacy laws, such as:  The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)  The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) The South Africa Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA)  Under these laws — and many others worldwide — it is necessary for businesses to maintain a reasonable level of data security. Implementing a cybersecurity framework is an excellent way to achieve this. Looking for more information about regional and industry-specific data protection laws? Visit our compliance content hub. 
What sorts of organizations should implement a cybersecurity framework? Implementing a cybersecurity framework is mandatory in some industries. For example, organizations that handle cardholder data must comply with the PCI DSS framework. However, a business of virtually any size — and in any industry — can adopt a cybersecurity framework at relatively low cost.  One way that a small business can achieve cybersecurity compliance is by choosing a flexible framework —  such as the CIS Controls or NIST Cybersecurity Framework, and prioritizing the implementation of controls according to its business needs and operating context. Now, let’s look at four of the best-known cybersecurity frameworks.
Introduction to CIS Controls The Center for Internet Security (CIS) Controls framework can help you mitigate and defend against the most basic cyberattacks.  Here are the 20 CIS Controls: Basic CIS Controls Inventory and Control of Hardware Assets Inventory and Control of Software Assets Continuous Vulnerability Management Controlled Use of Administrative Privileges Secure Configuration for Hardware and Software on Mobile Devices, Laptops, Workstations, and Servers Maintenance, Monitoring, and Analysis of Audit Logs Foundational CIS Controls Email and Web Browser Protections Malware Defenses Limitation and Control of Network Ports, Protocols, and Services Data Recovery Capabilities Secure Configuration for Network Devices, such as Firewalls, Routers, and Switches Boundary Defense Data Protection Controlled Access Based on the Need to Know Wireless Access Control Account Monitoring and Control Organizational CIS Controls Implement a Security Awareness and Training Program Application Software Security Incident Response and Management Penetration Tests and Red Team Exercises
CIS Control 13: Data Protection  To give you an idea of what the CIS controls require, we’ll take a closer look at Control 13: Data Protection. CIS Control 13 provides some practical steps to help you protect data from exfiltration and cyberattacks. At its core, Control 13 requires organizations to: Use a combination of encryption, integrity protection, and data loss prevention (DLP) methods to ensure the security of data Limit and report on data exfiltration attempts Mitigate the effects of data compromise Control 13 contains nine sub-controls. Some of these are achievable for businesses of all sizes, such as: 13.1: Maintain an Inventory of Sensitive Information 13.2: Remove Sensitive Data or Systems Not Regularly Accessed by Organization 13.6: Encrypt Mobile Device Data If your organization has “moderate” or “significant” resources, it can implement further sub-controls, such as: 13.3: Monitor and Block Unauthorized Network Traffic 13.4: Only Allow Access to Authorized Cloud Storage or Email Providers 13.5: Monitor and Detect Any Unauthorized Use of Encryption By implementing the CIS controls and sub-controls on a priority basis, businesses can implement a reasonably effective cybersecurity program.  Looking for a straightforward way to implement multiple sub-controls across several CIS controls? implement email security software. Email is the entry-point for 96% of phishing attacks.
Introduction to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (full title: Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity) is a comprehensive set of security controls and guidance for private sector organizations. Currently, at version 1.1, the framework aims to improve the general level of cybersecurity among US organizations. The framework is guidance — it’s entirely voluntary  — and it can be customized according to a company’s sector, resources, and risk profile. The framework’s “core” consists of cybersecurity activities and outcomes — written in accessible language that should be understandable to non-technical teams. (Phew!) The core activities and outcomes are sorted into five functions, which are further divided into categories. We’ve listed them below.  Identify: The “Identify” function provides the essential, foundational activities and outcomes necessary to use the framework. Outcomes categories associated with this function include: ID.AM: Asset Management ID.BE: Business Environment ID.RA: Risk Assessment Protect: The “Protect” function activities help mitigate the impact of a potential cyberattack or data breach. Protect outcome categories include: PR.AC: Identity Management and Access Control PR.AT: Awareness and Training PR.DS: Data Security Detect: The “Detect” function enables businesses to quickly detect that a cybersecurity event has occurred. Detect outcome categories include: DE.AE: Anomalies and Events  DE.CM: Security Continuous Monitoring DE.DP: Detection Processes Respond: Implementing the “Respond” function will ensure your business takes appropriate action during a cybersecurity event. Outcome categories in this function include: RS.RP: Response Planning  RS.CO: Communications  RS.AN: Analysis Recover: The “Recover” function allows an organization to return to normal functioning after a cyberattack. Recover function outcome categories include: RC.RP: Recovery Planning  RC.IM: Improvements RC.CO: Communications Each function’s categories are, in turn, divided into subcategories. For example: ID.AM (function: Identity, category: Asset Management): ID.AM-1: Physical devices and systems within the organization are inventoried ID.AM-2: Software platforms and applications within the organization are inventoried ID.AM-3: Organizational communication and data flows are mapped The subcategories all come with “informative references”, which are practical resources to help businesses achieve the outcomes.  For example, ID.AM-1 (Identify: Asset Management) includes the following references: CIS Control 1  ISO 27001:2013 Annexes A.8.1.1 and A.8.1.2 NIST Special Priority (SP) 800-53 (revision 4) CM-8 and PM-5 Introduction to ISO 27000 Series
The ISO 27000 Series (sometimes called the ISO/IEC 27000 Series) is a family of information security standards published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). The ISO 27000 Series is extensive, covering information security requirements, guidelines, and sector-specific standards. Examples of some of the published standards in the ISO 27000 Series include: ISO 27000: Information Security Management Systems — Overview and Vocabulary ISO 27003: Information Security Management System Implementation Guidance ISO 27018: Code of Practice for Protection of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) in Public Clouds Acting as PII Processors ISO 27019: Information Security for Process Control in the Energy Industry ISO 27032: Guideline for cybersecurity ISO 27033: IT network security Businesses of all sizes can implement one or more of the ISO 27000 Series standards. These are internationally recognized standards and are well-respected around the world.  While implementing ISO 27000 controls is not legally mandatory, there is an expectation of ISO-compliance in many industries and contexts. For example, for public cloud storage service providers that process personal information, achieving ISO 27018 compliance is crucial. ISO 27001 To give you a feel for ISO 27000 implementation, we’re going to take a closer look at one of the more popular standards in the series: ISO 27001, full name “Information technology — Security techniques — Information security management systems — Requirements.” ISO 20071 aims to enable businesses to establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve an information security management system (ISMS). Unlike the CIS Controls or the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, ISO 20071 is not available for free. The ISO 27001 standard consists of ten “clauses,” and an annex containing 114 controls, sorted into 14 sets. A business can prioritize its implementation of these controls according to its operational requirements. An essential part of complying with ISO 27001 is risk assessment. An ISO 27001 risk assessment can be broken down into several stages: Creating a risk assessment methodology that accounts for: Your operating context Risk criteria Risk tolerance Identifying information assets, such as: Digital documents Paper files Storage devices Mobile devices Identifying threats: Social engineering attacks, such as spear phishing Exfiltration of data by trusted employees Weak passwords leading to hacked employee accounts ISO 27001 compliance is an ongoing process that requires the commitment of employees across your whole organization. Once a company has implemented sufficient controls, it can undergo an audit and obtain ISO 27001 certification. Tessian is ISO 27001 certified. You can read more about your integrations, compatibility, and partnerships here. 
Introduction to PCI DSS The PCI DSS applies to all organizations that accept, transmit, or store information associated with payment cards (known as “merchants”). The PCI DSS sits alongside the PCI PTS (for manufacturers) and the PCI PA-DSS (for software developers). Unlike the other frameworks we’ve looked at, the PCI DSS is mandatory for any business that qualifies as a merchant. The Payment Card Industry Council enforces PCI DSS compliance, and — in some jurisdictions — it is incorporated into law. The framework’s requirements differ according to how many Visa transactions a merchant processes per year. There are four levels of PCI DSS requirements: Level 1: Any merchant that:  Processes more than 6 million Visa transactions per year, or Is determined by Visa as needing to meet level 1 requirements Level 2: Any merchant that processes 1-6 million Visa transactions per year Level 3: Merchants that process 20,000-1 million eCommerce Visa transactions per year Level 4: Any merchant that: Processes fewer than 20,000 Visa transactions per year, or Processes fewer than 1 million non-eCommerce Visa transactions per year As you can see, eCommerce merchants have slightly stricter requirements due to the risks of transacting online.  If a merchant suffers a data breach, it might be required to move up a level to continue making card transactions. This is one of many reasons you should take a “security-first” approach and implement as many cybersecurity controls as your budget allows. The PCI DSS consists of 12 requirements, which can be summarized as: Use a firewall Change default passwords and other security parameters Protect cardholder data in storage Encrypt cardholder in transit Implement and update antivirus software  Ensure systems and applications are secure Restrict access to cardholder data Assign unique user IDs  Maintain physical safeguards over cardholder data Monitor access to cardholder data and network resources  Test security systems  Maintain an information security policy In fewer words: Merchants must protect cardholder data from internal and external threats.  How can Tessian help with cybersecurity framework implementation? As we’ve seen, all cybersecurity frameworks require businesses to protect the information in their control from threats such as: Social engineering attacks  Accidental data loss Insider threats Across three solutions, Tessian detects and prevents email-based cybersecurity threats. Why email? Read more about why email is the threat vector cybersecurity leaders are most concerned about on our blog.  You can also learn why rule-based DLP solutions are failing and why the world’s top organizations (in some of the most regulated industries) trust Tessian.
ATO/BEC Data Exfiltration Compliance
September Cybersecurity News Roundup
30 September 2020
We’re back with another monthly roundup of cybersecurity news. Cybercriminals have once again been busy, with several high-profile data breaches and ransomware attacks occurring throughout September. And – rather unsurprisingly – social media platforms Twitter and TikTok have made the cut for the third month running. Here are the top cybersecurity stories from September 2020, including links to further information. Need to catch-up? Check out headlines from July and top stories from August on our blog. Researchers Predict That CEOs Will Be Personally Liable for Cyber-Physical Attacks Research and advisory firm Gartner (who recently named Tessian a Cool Vendor) predicted this month that 75% of CEOs could hold personal liability for “cyber-physical” attacks by 2024. Cyber-physical attacks aim to impact the “real world,” including critical infrastructure, internet of things devices, and healthcare equipment. Such attacks can result in physical injury and death. Gartner predicts that that cyber-physical attacks will cause up to $50 billion of damage by 2023 So what if Gartner is right? It would mean that if a company suffers a cyberattack resulting in physical harm — and it turns out that the company has not implemented appropriate cybersecurity measures — the company’s CEO could have to pay fines with their own money. 
Gartner’s research tells us what every effective business leader already knows — an effective cybersecurity program is an essential requirement for every organization. If a cyberattack occurs, the buck stops with the company’s senior executives. Argentinian Government Faces $4 Million Ransom Following Cyberattack On September 6, Argentina temporarily stopped allowing people to cross its borders after the Netwalker ransomware hit the country. The attackers encrypted government migration data and demanded 355 Bitcoins (around $4 million) to unencrypt it. This cyberattack led to chaos across border checkpoints — but the Argentinian government told domestic news website Infobae that it had no intention of negotiating with the hackers. Ransomware continues to cause havoc worldwide, and it appears the problem is only getting worse. Research by SonicWall recorded approximately 121 million ransomware attacks in the first half of 2020. Personal Information of 46,000 US Military Veterans Breached The US Veterans Association (VA) announced this month that the personal information of around 46,000 military veterans had been “accessed by unauthorized users.” The cybercriminals aimed to “divert payments” intended for healthcare providers. The VA’s financial services team wrote to the affected individuals to advise on how to mitigate the effects of the breach and offer free access to credit monitoring services. The VA serves veterans all over the US. Strict new data breach laws in several jurisdictions — including New York, Washington DC, and Oregan — mean that the VA could face huge fines given the breach’s context. Want to know more about US data security laws? Read our guidance for security leaders. 75% of IT leaders believe the future of work is hybrid In a new report – The Future of Hybrid Working – Tessian reveals that IT leaders and employees both believe the future of work will be remote or hybrid. But, it’s clear this shift won’t be easy. Check out some of the key stats below: 82% of IT leaders believe employees are at greater risk of phishing attacks when working remotely Over a third of IT leaders are worried about their teams will stretched too far in terms of time and resource Half of emoployees have been working on their personal devices since March 2020 Nearly 75% of employees said they received a phishing email while working on a personal device between March and July 2020….and 68% admitted to clicking a link or downloading an attachment within that email 78% of IT leaders think their organization is at greater risk of insider threats if their company adopts a permanent hybrid working structure Read the full report to learn more and to understand how business can balance flexibility and security without draining IT teams’ resources. Thousands of COVID-19 Patients’ Data Leaked Due to “Human Error” A massive data breach occurred in Wales this month when the personal information of 18,105 coronavirus patients was leaked following an “individual human error.” The breach affected every Welsh resident who tested positive for COVID-19 between February 27 and August 30. Public Health Wales said that the data included the “initials, date of birth, geographical area, and sex” of the affected individuals. In nearly 11% of people, though, the data also included the name of the nursing home or other healthcare setting in which the individual lived. The data was uploaded onto a public server, where it was accessible and searchable for around 20 hours. It was viewed 56 times throughout this period.  Human error is a key cause of data breaches. Statistics show that around 88% of data breaches start with human error, and almost half of all employees believe they have made an error at work leading to security repercussions. Chinese Company Holds Data About 2.4 million Influential People An academic at Fulbright University, Vietnam, has uncovered a vast Chinese database containing personal information of around 2.4 million people and their families. It looks like these individuals are “people of interest” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The company responsible for maintaining this huge database “provides big data analytics as well as other functionality to support Chinese military and intelligence analysts,” according to a research paper. The research also suggests that the CCP uses the data for “intelligence, military, security, and state operations in information warfare and influence targeting.”  The database is believed to provide a way for the CCP to influence people in target sectors. It may be one of many such databases maintained by Chinese companies. Much of the information in the database has been gleaned from publicly-available sources. The Chinese database is yet another important reason you should consider limiting the amount of personal information you put online. You can learn more about how hackers are using open-source recon for deepfakes and other social engineering attacks from Elvis M. Chan, Supervisory Special Agent at the FBI and Nina Schick, Author of “Deep Fakes and the Infocalypse: What You Urgently Need to Know”, who both joined us at Tessian Human Layer Security Summit. You can access their session “Safeguarding the 2020 Elections, Disarming Deepfakes via HLS On-Demand.  Twitter Provides Enhanced Security For US Election Following its spear phishing incident this July, Twitter has announced enhanced account security for certain “high-profile accounts” throughout the US election. Twitter said that various types of accounts, including those belonging to US politicians, campaign officials, and political journalists, would receive the security enhancements from September 17. So what’s changing? First, affected users must create “strong passwords,” of at least ten characters in length. They will need to confirm password reset requests via email. The affected users will also be “strongly encouraged” to enable two-factor authentication (2FA). But that’s not all. Recall that the July spear phishing incident involved “internal support tools” — it wasn’t primarily an issue with users’ account passwords. To address this, Twitter also states that it will improve internal monitoring of the affected accounts, including by using “more sophisticated detections and alerts,” “increased login defenses,” and “expedited account recovery” processes. Want to know how to avoid the issues Twitter faced this July? Read our guidance on “vishing” attacks. UHS Hospitals Hit by Reported Country-Wide Ryuk Ransomware Attack On September 27, Universal Health Services (UHS) – a Fortune 500 hospital and healthcare services provider that serves 3.5 million patients a year – was the target of a cyberattack that disable multiple antivirus programs and left hospitals around the country without access to computer and phone systems. According to employees, files were being renamed to include the .ryk extenstion, computers’ screens changed, and – eventually – shut down, leaving them without access to anything computer-based. And, in response to the attack, employees were told to shut down all systems to block attackers’ from reaching more devices on the network. While UHS hasn’t made a statement, the logistics of the incident suggest ransomware. That means patient and employee data is at risk. Energy Companies Advised to Create Cyberattack Response Plans The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the North American Electricity Reliability Corporation (NERC) have released a report advising energy providers on creating an Incident Response and Recovery (IRR) plan for cyberattacks. The report is based around an existing cybersecurity framework: the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-61, also known as the Computer Security Incident Handling Guide.  Governments appear to be increasingly concerned about the cybersecurity of critical infrastructure. This concern is well-founded — in 2019, 90% of security professionals surveyed across the utilities, energy, health, and transport sectors reported that their organizations had faced at least one successful cyberattack. Much of the advice to energy providers is good practice across all sectors. FERC and NERC recommend a four-part framework, consisting of security controls relating to preparation, detection and analysis, containment and eradication, and post-incident activity.
UK Agency Warns Schools and Universities About Ransomware Attacks As students worldwide return to schools, colleges, and universities, education providers are most concerned with defending against a COVID-19 outbreak. But the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) gave a stark warning about a different type of threat: ransomware. The NCSC’s alert describes “recent trends observed in ransomware attacks” targeting the education sector, which the agency says are increasingly common. The guidance follows a series of ransomware attacks against universities in the UK, US, and Canada this July. The agency warns that cybercriminals are exploiting out-of-date software and are accessing remote desktop protocol (RDP) software using credentials stolen via phishing attacks. It also warns that phishing emails are being used to deploy ransomware. So how does the NCSC recommend education providers protect themselves? The same ways all cyber-secure organizations protect themselves — including ”disrupting ransomware attack vectors” by implementing phishing defenses, and “enabling effective recovery” by keeping backups of data. Implementing DMARC is also essential to prevent brand impersonation and successful spear phishing attacks. And, according to Tessian research, 40% of the top 20 US universities aren’t using DMARC records.  TikTok Ban Delayed Following ByteDance Sale On September 21, US President Trump said he had approved the sale of part of ByteDance, the parent company of video-sharing platform TikTok, to Oracle and Wal-Mart. The deal temporarily averts harsh restrictions on TikTok set out by the US Department of Commerce three days earlier. The sale results from an executive order issued by President Trump in August, stating that the TikTok app “captures vast swaths of information from its users, including… location data and browsing and search histories.” TikTok maintains that this activity is standard industry practice. The US companies could take a collective 20% stake in ByteDance, with Oracle hosting TikTok user data in Oracle Cloud. Some analyses suggest that security-conscious nations and businesses are increasingly likely to implement these sorts of “data localization” measures. Trump had previously assured the public that TikTok would be “totally controlled” by the US firms. However, the president assured a press conference that the companies would be using “separate clouds and very, very powerful security.” That’s all for this month. If we missed anything, please email madeline.rosenthal@tessian.com and stay tuned for the next roundup. Don’t forget: You can easily share this on social media via the buttons at the top right of this post. 
Remote Working
How Hybrid-Remote Working Will Affect Cybersecurity
By Laura Brooks
29 September 2020
When the world went into lockdown, ways of working changed forever.  Mandatory remote work arrangements meant people had to find ways to get their jobs done in their homes and most of us quickly settled into a new rhythm of work. Now, after months of being away from the office, the so-called “new normal” is starting to feel, well, just normal. Employees don’t want to give up the level of flexibility and autonomy they’ve come to experience.   In fact, according to our latest report, Securing the Future of Hybrid Working, just 11% of UK and US employees said they’d want to work exclusively in the office post-pandemic, with the average employee wanting to work from home at least two days a week. And, over a third of people said they wouldn’t even consider working for a company if it didn’t offer remote working in the future. !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js"); Keep reading to find out: How IT leaders think remote and hybrid working will affect cybersecurity What these new set-ups will do to IT teams’ workloads How business’ can balance flexibility and security Remote, office-based, or a bit of both?  Businesses have some big decisions to make. Do they encourage employees to come back to the office post-pandemic, or opt for a fully remote workforce?  For many, a hybrid model – where employees can split their time between working in the office and anywhere else they’d like – appears to be the best option for the long-term future of their company. Google, for example, has already announced that this is the approach it’ll take.  This way of working requires companies to completely transform the way their companies have previously run – and it may come at the IT department’s expense. The majority of IT leaders surveyed believe permanent remote work will put more pressure on their teams, while over a third (34%) are worried about their workers becoming stretched too far in terms of time and resource. This is because, while it is great for employees, a hybrid way of working actually offers the worst of both worlds for IT teams who have to simultaneously manage and mitigate security risks that occur in and out of the office, while providing a seamless experience that enables employees to work-from-anywhere. Why would permanent remote working arrangements increase IT teams’ workload?  One of IT teams’ biggest concerns is the risk of phishing attacks, with 82% of IT leaders believing employees are at greater risk of phishing attacks when working remotely. Their concerns are valid; over three-quarters of employees said they received a phishing email while working on their personal device between March and July 2020, and 68% admitted to clicking a link or downloading an attachment within that email. In fact, our report shows that nearly half of companies experienced a data breach or security incident between March and July 2020 – the remote working period enforced by the global pandemic – and half of these incidents (49%) were caused by phishing attacks.  This made phishing the leading cause of security incidents during this time.
Insider threats are another concern. Over three-quarters of IT leaders (78%) think their organization is at greater risk of insider threats if their company adopts a permanent hybrid working structure. Such risks include employees bringing infected devices or documents into the office after working remotely and sharing sensitive information with their personal accounts.  It’s also worrying that 43% of the security incidents reported between March – July 2020 were caused by malicious insiders. For more information about the different “types” of insiders and real-world examples of each, visit our blog. The problem is that insider threats are much more difficult to detect and mitigate when workforces are distributed. Why? A lack of visibility.  A previous Tessian report revealed that nearly half of employees feel like they can get away with unsafe cybersecurity practices when working away from the office because they aren’t being watched by their IT team.   Then, there are the security risks associated with Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) practices.  Half of employees we surveyed have been working on their personal devices since the world went into lockdown in March 2020. The top BYOD security risks cited by IT professionals included: The downloading of unsafe apps Malware infections Software updates.  It’s not surprising, then, that 1 in 3 IT leaders are worried about their teams being too stretched in terms of time and resource in a permanent remote working structure. 
How can businesses balance flexibility and security without draining IT teams’ resources?  Securing distributed workforces isn’t going to be easy. Why? Because businesses must transform and reinvent ways of working but IT teams are under-resourced and budgets are getting smaller and smaller. Failure to transform and deliver a seamless hybrid experience, though, could threaten companies’ security posture and see businesses losing out on talent.  Education on the threats people can be exposed to and the threats they pose to company security when working away from the office is, therefore, an important first step. So, it is encouraging to see that 58% of IT leaders are planning to introduce more security training should their company adopt a permanent remote working structure.  But approaches to training may need a rethink so that it resonates with employees and isn’t seen as “just another thing” on people’s to-do list. According to our report, despite 57% of IT departments implementing more education and security training for their employees during the pandemic, nearly 1 in 5 workers said they didn’t even take part. !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js"); This brings us to our second recommendation – security solutions shouldn’t hinder people’s productivity.  It’s clear people want to be able to work flexibly, so tools need to be flexible, too. Solutions like Tessian are invisible to employees until threats are detected, which means we cause minimal disruption to people’s workflow. Our warnings are helpful and educational, not annoying. We give people the information they need to make safer cybersecurity decisions and improve their behaviors over time.  Lastly, IT teams need greater visibility into their riskiest and most at-risk employees – regardless of where they’re working – in order to tailor training and policies and improve cybersecurity behaviors over time. Getting this level of visibility shouldn’t be a burden to the IT team, though. IT teams have enough going on, so solutions that leverage machine learning can take away labor-intensive tasks and help free up IT professionals’ time.  The way people work is quickly changing. But one thing will stay the same; you need to protect your organization’s most important asset – your people.  Businesses that protect their people from security threats and empower them to do great work, without security getting in their way, will set themselves for long-term success.  Read the full report – Securing The Future of Hybrid Working – today.
Data Exfiltration ATO/BEC Email DLP Compliance
Compliance in the Legal Sector: Laws & How to Comply
16 September 2020
Thanks to the digital transformation and increasingly strict data security obligations, law firms’ business priorities are changing. Today, data protection, transparency, and privacy are top-of-mind.  It makes sense.  Keep reading to find out… Why the legal sector is bound to such strict compliance standards Which regulations govern law firms How cybersecurity can help ensure compliance Interested in learning more about regional compliance standards or those that impact other industries? Check out our Compliance Hub to find articles, tips, guides, and more or download our CEO’s Guide to Data Protection and Compliance to learn more about how cybersecurity enables business and drives revenue. 
Why is the legal sector bound to strict compliance standards? Lawyers’ hard drives, email accounts, and smartphones can contain anything from sensitive intellectual property and trade secrets to the Personally Identifiable Information (PII) of clients.  Unfortunately, hackers and cybercriminals are all too aware of this. It’s no surprise, then, that the legal sector is amongst the most targeted by social engineering attacks like spear phishing. Ransomware is a big problem, too. In fact, just a few months ago, Grubman Shire Meiselas & Sacks, a prominent media law firm, had its client information compromised.  Those behind the attack later threatened to auction some of these files concerning major celebrities for as much as $1.5 million unless the firm paid a $42 million ransom.  But, it’s not just inbound attacks that law firms have to worry about. Because the legal sector is highly competitive, incidents involving Insider Threats are a concern, too.  96% of IT leaders working in the legal sector say they’re worried that someone within the organization will cause a breach, either accidentally (via a misdirected email, for example) or maliciously.  The regulations governing law firms When it comes to data protection and privacy, the legal sector is subject to a relatively strict regulatory framework both under the law and rules imposed by professional bodies. Depending on where a firm is based and what its practice areas are, it can be subject to several stringent laws and regulations. This is especially true for firms operating in major markets like the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union. In this article, we’ll focus on some of the more general regulations and standards that all firms operating in these markets are expected to abide by. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) When the GDPR was introduced in 2018, it represented the largest change to data protection legislation in almost two decades. It also contains some of the most thorough compliance obligations for law firms and indeed any other entity that collects, stores, and processes data. The GDPR has been designed to help and guide organizations with a legitimate business interest as to how personal data should be handled and gives regulators the power to impose large fines on firms that aren’t compliant.  You can read more about the largest GDPR fines (so far) in 2020 on our blog. What is the GDPR’s purpose? The GDPR was introduced amid growing concerns surrounding the safety of personal data and the need to protect it from hackers, cybercrime, Insider Threats, unethical use, and the growing attack surface.  Essentially, it gives citizens full and complete control of their data, subject to some restrictions (for example, where data must be held by firms by law).  What is the scope of the GDPR? The legislation regulates the use of ‘personal data’ and applies to all organizations located within the EU, as well as organizations outside the EU who offer their goods or services to EU citizens. It also applies to organizations that hold data pertaining to EU citizens, regardless of their location.  What should law firms know about the GDPR? The main part of the GDPR that law firms should be paying attention to is Article 5.  This sets out the principles relating to the collection and processing of personal data. The six key principles are that personal data: Should be processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner; Should only be collected for legitimate purposes; Should be limited to what’s necessary in relation to the purpose(s) it’s processed; Must be accurate and kept up to date, with any inaccurate erased or rectified; Should be held for longer than is necessary for its purposes*; and Should be held with adequate security against theft, loss, and/or damage.  The GDPR also gives your clients the right to ask for their data to be removed (‘right of erasure’) without the need for any outside authorization. Note: Data can only be kept contrary to a client’s wishes to ensure compliance with other regulations.  What should a firm do in the event of a breach? Before GDPR, law firms could follow their own protocols when dealing with a data breach. But now, the GDPR forces firms to report any data breaches, no matter how big or small they are, to the relevant regulatory authority within 72 hours. In the UK, for example, the regulatory authority is the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO):  The notification must: Contain relevant details regarding the nature of the breach; The approximate number of people impacted; and Contact details of the firm’s Data Protection Officer (DPO).  Clients who have had their personal data compromised must also be notified of the breach, the potential outcome, and any remediation “without undue delays”.  It’s important to note that breaches aren’t always the results of malicious activity by an Insider Threat or hacker outside the organization. Even accidents can result in breaches. In fact, misdirected emails (emails sent to the wrong person) has consistently been one of the most frequently reported incidents to the ICO.  That’s why it’s essential law firms (and other organizations) have safeguards in place to prevent mistakes like these from happening. Looking for a solution? Tessian Guardian prevents misdirected emails in some of the world’s most prestigious law firms, including Dentons, Hill Dickinson, and Travers Smith What are the penalties for non-compliance? Financial penalties imposed for GDPR violations can be harsh, and they often are; regulatory authorities are keen to highlight just how important the GDPR is and how seriously it should be taken. Fines for non-compliance can be as high as 4% of annual global turnover or €20 million—whichever is higher. American Bar Association Rule 1.6 Rule 1.6 governs the confidentiality of client information. It states, “A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation of a client.” Simply put, lawyers must make efforts to protect the data of their clients.  Two years ago, the American Bar Association issued new guidance in the form of Formal Opinion 483. This covers the importance of data protection and how firms should act when, not if, a security breach happens. This wording demonstrates that the ABA recognizes that breaches are part and parcel of firms operating in the modern world, and the statistics confirm this. 
In essence, Formal Opinion 483 states:  Lawyers have a duty of competence in implementing adequate security measures regarding technology. Lawyers must reasonably and continuously assess their systems, operating procedures, and plans for mitigating a breach. In the event of a suspected or confirmed breach, lawyers must take steps to stop the attack and prevent any further loss of data. When a breach is detected and confirmed, lawyers must inform their clients in a timely manner and with enough information for clients to make informed decisions.  The bottom line: law firms must protect data with cybersecurity. Solicitors’ Regulation Authority Code of Conduct In the UK, solicitors are obliged under the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA) Code of Conduct to maintain effective systems and mitigate risks to client confidentiality and client money. Solicitors are also obliged to ensure systems comply more broadly with the SRA’s other regulatory arrangements.  The SRA says that, although being hacked or falling victim to a data breach is not necessarily a failure to meet these requirements, firms should take proportionate steps to protect themselves and their clients while retaining the advantages of advanced IT.  Where a report of cybercrime (note: crime, not a loss that takes place due to negligence) is received, the SRA takes a constructive approach in dealing with the firm, especially if the firm:  Is proactive and immediately notifies the SRA. Has taken steps to inform the client and as a minimum make good any loss. Shows they are taking steps to improve their systems and processes to reduce the risk of a similar incident happening again.  That means that, under the SRA’s Code of Conduct, law firms should take steps to prevent inbound attacks like spear phishing and set-up policies and processes that ensure swift reporting.  The good news is, Tessian can help with both inbound attacks and Insider Threats and has a history of successfully protecting law firms around the world from both. 
How Tessian helps law firms stay compliant Across all three of the regulations listed here, there’s one commonality: law firms are responsible for ensuring that their IT systems and processes are robust and secure enough to keep data safe and mitigate the chance of a breach taking place.  But, that’s easier said than done, especially in our dynamic and digitally connected world where threats are ever-evolving. So, where should law firms start? Email. 90% of all data breaches start on email and it’s the threat vector IT leaders are most concerned about protecting. That’s why Tessian is focused on protecting this channel. Across three solutions, Tessian detects and prevents threats using machine learning, which means it’s constantly adapting, without requiring maintenance from thinly-stretched security teams. Tessian Defender detects and prevents spear phishing Tessian Guardian detects and prevents accidental data loss via misdirected email Tessian Enforcer detects and prevents data exfiltration attempts from Insider Threats Importantly, Tessian is non-disruptive. That way, partners, lawyers, and administrators can do their jobs without security getting in the way. Tessian stops threats, not business.  To learn more about how Tessian helps law firms like Dentons, Hill Dickinson, and Travers Smith protect data, maintain client trust, and satisfy compliance standards, talk to one of our experts. 
Customer Stories Data Exfiltration ATO/BEC Email DLP Integrated Cloud Email Security Compliance
18 Actionable Insights From Tessian Human Layer Security Summit
By Maddie Rosenthal
09 September 2020
In case you missed it, Tessian hosted its third (and final) Human Layer Security Summit of 2020 on September 9. This time, we welcomed over a dozen security and business leaders from the world’s top institutions to our virtual stage, including: Jeff Hancock from Stanford University David Kennedy, Co-Founder and Chief Hacking Officer at TrustedSec Merritt Baer, Principal Security Architect at AWS Rachel Beard, Principal Security Technical Architect at Salesforce  Tim Fitzgerald, CISO at Arm  Sandeep Amar, CPO at MSCI  Martyn Booth, CISO at Euromoney  Kevin Storli, Global CTO and UK CISO at PwC Elvis M. Chan, Supervisory Special Agent at the FBI  Nina Schick, Author of “Deep Fakes and the Infocalypse: What You Urgently Need to Know” Joseph Blankenship, VP Research, Security & Risk at Forrester Howard Shultz, Former CEO at Starbucks  While you can watch the full event on YouTube below, we’ve identified 18 valuable insights that security, IT, compliance, and business leaders should apply to their strategies as they round out this year and look forward to the next.
Here’s what we learned at Tessian’s most recent Human Layer Security Summit. Not sure what Human Layer Security is? Check out this guide which covers everything you need to know about this new category of protection.  1. Cybersecurity is mission-critical Security incidents – whether it’s a ransomware attack, brute force attack, or data leakage from an insider threat – have serious consequences. Not only can people lose their jobs, but businesses can lose customer trust, revenue, and momentum. While this may seem obvious to security leaders, it may not be so obvious to individual departments, teams, and stakeholders. But it’s essential that this is communicated (and re-communicated).  Why? Because a company that’s breached cannot fulfill its mission. Keep reading for insights and advice around keeping your company secure, all directly from your peers in the security community. 2. Most breaches start with people People control our most sensitive systems and data. It makes sense, then, that most data breaches start with people. But, that doesn’t mean employees are the weakest link. They’re a business’ strongest asset! So, it’s all about empowering them to make better security decisions. That’s why organizations have to adopt people-centric security solutions and strategies.
The good news is, security leaders don’t face an uphill battle when it comes to helping employees understand their responsibility when it comes to cybersecurity… 3. Yes, employees are aware of their duty to protect data Whether it’s because of compliance standards, cybersecurity headlines in mainstream media, or a larger focus on privacy and protection at work, Martyn Booth, CISO at Euromoney reminded us that most employees are actually well aware of the responsibility they bear when it comes to safeguarding data.  This is great news for security leaders. It means the average employee will be more likely to abide by policies and procedures, will pay closer attention during awareness training, and will therefore contribute to a more positive security culture company-wide. Win-win. 4. But, employees are more vulnerable to phishing scams outside of their normal office environment  While – yes – employees are more conscious of cybersecurity, the shift to remote working has also left them more vulnerable to attacks like phishing scams.  “We have three “places”: home, work, and where we have fun. When we combine two places into one, it’s difficult psychologically. When we’re at home sitting at our coffee table, we don’t have the same cues that remind us to think about security that we do in the office. This is a huge disruption,” Jeff Hancock, Professor at Stanford University explained.  Unfortunately, hackers are taking advantage of these psychological vulnerabilities. And, as David Kennedy, Co-Founder and Chief Hacking Officer at TrustedSec pointed out, this isn’t anything new. Cybercriminals have always been opportunistic in their attacks and therefore take advantage of chaos and emotional distress.  To prevent successful opportunistic attacks, he recommends that you: Reassess what the new baseline is for attacks Educate employees on what threats look like today, given recent events Identify which brands, organizations, people, and departments may be impersonated (and targeted) in relation to the pandemic But, it’s not just inbound email attacks we need to be worried about.  5. They’re more likely to make other mistakes that compromise cybersecurity, too This change to our normal environment doesn’t just affect our ability to spot phishing attacks. It also makes us more likely to make other mistakes that compromise cybersecurity. Across nearly every session, our guest speakers said they’ve seen more incidents involving human error and that security leaders should expect this trend to continue. That’s why training, policies, and technology are all essential components of any security strategy. More on this below. 6. Security awareness training has to be ongoing and ever-evolving At our first Human Layer Security Summit back in March, Mark Logsdon, Head of Cyber Assurance and Oversight at Prudential, highlighted three key flaws in security awareness training: It’s boring It’s often irrelevant It’s expensive What he said is still relevant six months on and it’s a bigger problem than ever, especially now that the perimeter has disappeared, security teams are short-handed, and individual employees are working at home and on their own devices. So, what can security leaders do?  Kevin Storli, Global CTO and UK CISO at PwC highlighted the importance of tailoring training to ensure it’s always relevant. That means that instead of just reminding employees about compliance standards and the importance of a strong password, we should also be focusing on educating employees about remote access, endpoints, and BYOD policies. But one training session isn’t enough to make security best practice really stick. These lessons have to be constantly reinforced through gamification, campaigns, and technology.  Tim Fitzgerald, CISO at Arm highlighted how Tessian’s in-the-moment warnings have helped his employees make the right decisions at the right time.  “Warnings help create that trigger in their brain. It makes them pause and gives them that extra breath before taking the next potentially unsafe step. This is especially important when they’re dealing with data or money. Tessian ensures they question what they’re doing,” he said.
7. You have to combine human policies with technical controls to ensure security  It’s clear that technology and training are both valuable. That means your best bet is to combine the two. In discussion with Ed Bishop, Tessian Co-Founder and CTO, Merritt Baer, Principal Security Architect at AWS and Rachel Beard, Principal Security Technical Architect at Salesforce, both highlighted how important it is for organizations to combine policies with technical controls. But security teams don’t have to shoulder the burden alone. When using tools like Salesforce, for example, organizations can really lean on the vendor to understand how to use the platform securely. Whether it’s 2FA, customized policies, or data encryption, many security features will be built-in.  8. But…Zero Trust security models aren’t always the answer While – yes – it’s up to security teams to ensure policies and controls are in place to safeguard data and systems, too many policies and controls could backfire. That means that “Zero Trust” security models aren’t necessarily the best way to prevent breaches.
9. Security shouldn’t distract people from their jobs  Security teams implement policies and procedures, introduce new software, and make training mandatory for good reason. But, if security becomes a distraction for employees, they won’t exercise best practice.  The truth is, they just want to do the job they were hired to do!  Top tip from the event: Whenever possible, make training and policies customized, succinct, and relevant to individual people or departments.  10. It also shouldn’t prevent them from doing their jobs  This insight goes back to the idea that “Zero Trust” security models may not be the best way forward. Why? Because, like Rachel, Merrit, Sandeep, and Martyn all pointed out: if access controls or policies prevent an employee from doing their job, they’ll find a workaround or a shortcut. But, security should stop threats, not flow. That’s why the most secure path should also be the path of least resistance. Security strategies should find a balance between the right controls and the right environment.  This, of course, is a challenge, especially when it comes to rule-based solutions. “If-then” controls are blunt instruments. Solutions powered by machine learning, on the other hand, detect and prevent threats without getting in the way. You can learn more about the limitations of traditional data loss prevention solutions in our report The State of Data Loss Prevention 2020.  11. Showing downtrending risks helps demonstrate the ROI of security solutions  Throughout the event, several speakers mentioned that preemptive controls are just as important as remediation. And it makes sense. Better to detect risky behavior before a security incident happens, especially given the time and resources required in the event of a data breach.  But tracking risky behavior is also important. That way, security leaders can clearly demonstrate the ROI of security solutions. Martyn Booth, CISO at Euromoney, explained how he uses Tessian Human Layer Security Intelligence to monitor user behavior, influence safer behavior, and track risk over time. “We record how many alerts are sent out and how employees interact with those alerts. Do they follow the acceptable use policy or not? Then, through our escalation workflows that ingest Tessian data, we can escalate or reinforce. From that, we’ve seen incidents involving data exfiltration trend downwards over time. This shows a really clear risk reduction,” he said. 12. Targeted attacks are becoming more difficult to spot and hackers are using more sophisticated techniques As we mentioned earlier, hackers take advantage of psychological vulnerabilities. But, social media has turbo-charged cybercrime, enabling cybercriminals to create more sophisticated attacks that can be directed at larger organizations. Yes, even those with strong cybersecurity. Our speakers mentioned several examples, including Garmin and Twitter. So, how do they do it? Research! LinkedIn, company websites, out-of-office messages, press releases, and news articles all provide valuable information that a hacker could use to craft a believable email. But, there are ways to limit open-source recon. See tips from David Kennedy, Co-Founder and Chief Hacking Officer at TrustedSec, below. 
13. Deepfakes are a serious concern Speaking of social media, Elvis M Chan, Supervisory Special Agent at the FBI and Nina Schick, Author of “Deep Fakes and the Infocalypse: What You Urgently Need to Know”,  took a deep dive into deepfakes. And, according to Nina, “This is not an emerging threat. This threat is here. Now.” While we tend to associate deepfakes with election security, it’s important to note that this is a threat that affects businesses, too.  In fact, Tim Fitzgerald, CISO at Arm, cited an incident in which his CEO was impersonated in a deepfake over Whatsapp. The ask? A request to move money. According to Tim, it was quite compelling.  Unfortunately, deepfakes are surprisingly easy to make and generation is outpacing detection. But, clear policies and procedures around authenticating and approving requests can ensure these scams aren’t successful. Not sure what a deepfake is? We cover everything you need to know in this article: Deepfakes: What Are They and Why Are They a Threat? 14. Supply chain attacks are, too  In conversation with Henry Treveleyan Thomas, Head of Customer Success at Tessian, Kevin Storli, Global CTO and UK CISO at PwC discussed how organizations with large supply chains are especially vulnerable to advanced impersonation attacks like spear phishing. “It’s one thing to ensure your own organization is secure. But, what about your supply chain? That’s a big focus for us: ensuring our supply chain has adequate security controls,” he said. Why is this so important? Because hackers know large organizations like PwC will have robust security strategies. So, they’ll look for vulnerabilities elsewhere to gain a foothold. That’s why strong cybersecurity can actually be a competitive differentiator and help businesses attract (and keep) more customers and clients.  15. People will generally make the right decisions if they’re given the right information 88% of data breaches start with people. But, that doesn’t mean people are careless or malicious. They’re just not security experts. That’s why it’s so important security leaders provide their employees with the right information at the right time. Both Sandeep Amar, CPO at MSCI and Tim Fitzgerald, CISO at Arm talked about this in detail.  It could be a guide on how to spot spear phishing attacks or – as we mentioned in point #6 – in-the-moment warnings that reinforce training.   Check out their sessions for more insights.  16. Success comes down to people While we’ve talked a lot about human error and psychological vulnerabilities, one thing was made clear throughout the Human Layer Security Summit. A business’s success is completely reliant on its people. And, we don’t just mean in terms of security. Howard Shultz, Former CEO at Starbucks, offered some incredible advice around leadership which we can all heed, regardless of our role. In particular, he recommended: Creating company values that really guide your organization Ensuring every single person understands how their role is tied to the goals of the organization Leading with truth, transparency, and humility
17. But people are dealing with a lot of anxiety right now Whether you’re a CEO or a CISO, you have to be empathetic towards your employees. And, the fact is, people are dealing with a lot of anxiety right now. Nearly every speaker mentioned this. We’re not just talking about the global pandemic.  We’re talking about racial and social inequality. Political unrest. New working environments. Bigger workloads. Mass lay-offs.  Joseph Blankenship, VP Research, Security & Risk at Forrester, summed it up perfectly, saying “We have an anxiety-ridden user base and an anxiety-ridden security base trying to work out how to secure these new environments. We call them users, but they’re actually human beings and they’re bringing all of that anxiety and stress to their work lives.” That means we all have to be human first. And, with all of this in mind, it’s clear that….. 18. The role of the CISO has changed  Sure, CISOs are – as the name suggests – responsible for security. But, to maintain security company-wide, initiatives have to be perfectly aligned with business objectives, and every individual department, team, and person has to understand the role they play. Kevin Storli, Global CTO and UK CISO at PwC touched on this in his session. “To be successful in implementing security change, you have to bring the larger organization along on the journey. How do you get them to believe in the mission? How do you communicate the criticality? How do you win the hearts and minds of the people? CISOs no longer live in the back office and address just tech aspects. It’s about being a leader and using security to drive value.” That’s a tall order and means that CISOs have to wear many hats. They need to be technology experts while also being laser-focused on the larger business. And, to build a strong security culture, they have to borrow tactics from HR and marketing.  The bottom line: The role of the CISO is more essential now than ever. It makes sense. Security is mission-critical, remember? If you’re looking for even more insights, make sure you watch the full event, which is available on-demand. You can also check out previous Human Layer Security Summits on YouTube.
Email DLP Compliance
Ultimate Guide to The POPIA – South Africa’s Privacy Law
03 September 2020
Over the last several years, there have been a number of generally applicable data privacy and protection laws rolled out around the world, starting with Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation back in 2018.  Earlier this year, California released The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which took an even broader view than the GDPR of what’s considered private data.  The most recent privacy law? South Africa’s Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA). Note: The POPIA initially passed in 2013 but spent seven years in limbo, until it finally came into effect on July 1, 2020. It’s essential that security and business leaders understand which of these compliance standards they’re bound to comply with, how to comply, and the consequences of a compliance breach.
What businesses does the POPIA apply to? The POPIA applies to every type of company, regardless of size, sector, or location, so long as it is either: Based in South Africa, or Based outside of South Africa, but processes personal information within South Africa (unless it is only forwarding personal information through South Africa) That means that non-South African companies doing business in South Africa should comply with the POPIA, whether or not they have any physical presence in the country. We have good news, though. POPIA has a one-year transition period, so all affected businesses have until July 1, 2021 to ensure compliance. After this day, the South African Information Regulator will begin enforcing the law and fining non-compliant companies. Wondering how to ensure compliance? You can click the link to jump down the page to our section on “How to stay compliant with POPIA”. Otherwise, keep reading to find out what information is considered personal under POPIA.
What’s considered “personal information” under the POPIA? You have to remember, compliance is all about consumer privacy. So, POPIA, like the GDPR and CCPA, mandates that businesses properly “process” personal information. This includes collecting it, erasing it, and disclosing it to any third-parties.  So, what is “personal information”? The POPIA defines “personal information” as: “Information relating to an identifiable, living, natural person, and where it is applicable, an identifiable, existing juristic person” Within this definition: A “natural person” means an individual. An “existing juristic person” means a “legal person,” such as a corporation or charity. Importantly, by extending the definition of “personal information” to “juristic (legal) persons,” the POPIA gains a very broad scope that would cover certain business-to-business communications, too. Below is a non-exhaustive list of examples of personal information provided within the POPIA: Information relating to: Race  Gender  Physical or mental health  Belief Information about a person’s  Education Medical history Financial history An ID number, email address, phone number, or online identifier Biometric information A person’s opinions or preferences Private correspondence Opinions about a person A name, if the context in which the name is disclosed would reveal something about a person This data could be related to a business’ customers, employees, business contacts, prospective customers, and even visitors to their website. 
Who’s liable under the POPIA? We’ve already outlined which businesses need to comply with the POPIA. But, what about liability? The two main players are the “responsible party” and the “operator.” What is a “responsible party”? A “responsible party” is a public or private body that decides why and how to process personal information. A similar concept is the “data controller” under the GDPR and the “business” under the CCPA. What is an “operator” An “operator” is “a person who processes personal information for a responsible party” but is not under the responsible party’s direct authority. A similar concept is the “data processor” under the GDPR and the “service provider” under the CCPA. Operators are directly liable under the POPIA and must treat the personal information they process as confidential and should never disclose it without the responsible parties authorization. In the event of a data breach, they must notify the responsible party immediately.  Responsible parties, on the other hand, must ensure they only engage with operators under a written contract (which should ensure that the operator meets the POPIA’s data security obligations).  They must also monitor the operator’s activities to ensure that it meets its data security operations. In fewer words: everyone is responsible on some level for ensuring safe (and compliant) data processing.
You may need to adjust your service contracts so that they include a requirement to safeguard personal information. Now that you know who must comply with the POPIA, who’s liable, and what data is considered “personal”, we’ll explore perhaps the most important concept: How to lawfully process data under the POPIA. How do I lawfully process data under the POPIA? The POPIA provides a set of eight conditions businesses must satisfy when processing personal information.  To be truly effective (and ultimately ensure compliance) these principles must be baked into your overall business operations, from cybersecurity to HR.  In brief, the eight conditions for lawful processing are: Accountability: You must ensure POPIA compliance in respect of all the personal information in your control. Lawfulness: You must only collect personal information if it is adequate and non-excessive. You must have a legally justifiable reason for collecting personal information. Where possible, you must collect personal information directly from the data subject. Purpose specification: You must only collect personal information for a specific purpose, and you must not store it for longer than necessary to meet that purpose. Further processing limitation: You may only process personal information for further purposes if they are compatible with the reason you collected it. Information quality: You must ensure the personal information you maintain is accurate and complete. Openness: You must be transparent about how you provide personal information and provide consumers with notice about how and why you process their personal information. Security safeguards: You must take reasonable steps to secure the personal information in your control, and you must report any data breaches as soon as reasonably possible. Data subject participation: You must allow data subjects to access their personal information and correct or erase any inaccurate personal information. But, there are additional requirements for particularly sensitive information.
What types of information are considered “special” under the POPIA? Under the POPIA, particularly sensitive types of personal information are called “special personal information.” The categories of special personal information include: Religious or philosophical beliefs  Race or ethnic origin  Trade union membership  Political persuasion  Health or sex life  Biometric information Information about criminal behavior, including: Alleged offenses that have been committed by the individual Proceedings that may have taken place regarding the alleged offenses Like the GDPR, the POPIA places a general prohibition on the processing of special personal information. However, it is possible to process special personal information on the following grounds: With the consent of the data subject To exercise or defend your legal rights or obligations To comply with an obligation under international public law For historical, statistical, or research purposes in the public interest Where the information has been made public by the data subject
How can cybersecurity help me stay compliant with the POPIA? We know what you’re thinking: what steps can I actually take to ensure every individual, team, and department across my organization safely processes data? Like other compliance standards, the POPIA mandates “appropriate, reasonable technical and organizational measures” to prevent the loss of, damage to, and unauthorized access to personal information. The POPIA sets out four broad ways in which responsible parties must secure personal information: Identify internal and external risks Establish and maintain safeguards Regularly verify safeguards Continually update safeguards The POPIA also requires responsible parties to keep up-to-date with any sector-specific security standards and professional regulations, and ensure any operators also apply security safeguards to personal information. There’s a lot to unpack here. But, it all comes down to data loss prevention (DLP). While you can read all about DLP in this article: What is Data Loss Prevention – A Complete Guide to DLP, we’ll outline the different “types” of DLP below. Note: DLP does more or less the same thing wherever it is deployed – it looks for sensitive information crossing boundaries. But different DLP solutions operate in different ways depending on which “perimeter” is being guarded. Network DLP Network DLP protects data in motion by monitoring the traffic that enters and leaves the organization’s network. These solutions are mostly cloud-based and are designed to monitor network traffic between users and other endpoints connected through the Internet; every byte of data transmitted through a network will go through the cloud-based DLP solution.  Endpoint DLP Endpoint DLP protects data in use on employee’s devices (computers, mobile phones) by preventing unauthorized access. How? By ensuring information isn’t taken off work devices and sent or copied to unauthorized devices by allowing or denying certain tasks to be performed on the computer.  It is also able to detect and block viruses and other malware that could be transferred into your computer system from external sources, like a USB. Email DLP Email is the threat vector security and IT leaders are most concerned about, Why? Because both inbound and outbound traffic pose serious security threats.  According to data from Verizon, email is the main entry point for social engineering attacks like phishing and incidents involving Insider Threats have increased by 47% over the last two years. And, we can’t forget about accidental data loss – like misdirected emails – which is actually the most frequently reported security incident under the GDPR. Learn more about how Tessian detects and prevents both inbound and outbound threats on email to help organizations around the world stay compliant.  But organizations need more than security solutions. Under the POPIA, every public and private organization must also have an Information Officer. What are their responsibilities?  Encouraging the organization to comply with the conditions for lawful processing Assisting data subjects with requests to access their personal information Working with the Information Regulator in the event of an investigation Otherwise ensuring that the organization complies with the POPIA Once you have appointed your Information Officer, you must register them with the Information Regulator. But, what happens if DLP solutions (and your Information Officer) don’t successfully prevent data loss and a breach occurs? You have to notify relevant bodies.
What do I do in the event of a breach? If personal information is subject to unauthorized access, (i.e., a data breach occurs), responsible parties must notify: The Information Regulator, and The affected data subjects  Importantly, this must happen “as soon as reasonably possible” and should include: A description of the consequences of the breach An explanation of what the responsible party has done to contain the breach Advice to the data subjects regarding how to mitigate the impact of the breach The identity of anyone who may have accessed the personal information (if known) This is a lot of work and one of the reasons why investigation and remediation are generally the costliest categories in an overall data breach. Which, by the way, cost organizations $3.92 million on average according to IBM’s latest Cost of a Data Breach Report.
What are the penalties under the POPIA? Breaches of the POPIA can lead to harsh penalties brought by the Information Regulator, including: A fine of between 1 million and 10 million ZAR (approximately $60,000 – $600,000 USD) Imprisonment for a term of up to ten years Both a fine and a prison term The POPIA also contains a private right of action, meaning that individual data subjects can bring a private legal claim against a responsible party. A case brought under the POPIA could lead to: “Actual damages,” to compensate data subjects for any losses they have incurred “Aggravated damages,” to compensate data subjects for the distress they have experienced Fines, imprisonment, and lawsuits are not the only concerns for businesses processing people’s personal information in South Africa. Even small-scale data breaches can lead to a complaint being lodged with the Information Regulator. For more information about how much business’ have been fined under other data protection laws, check out this article: 4 Biggest GDPR Fines of 2020 (So Far). If you take nothing else away from this article, it should be that compliance and security go hand-in-hand. Businesses in South Africa and beyond must take necessary steps to safeguard the data their organizations process and hold, which requires dedicated security and IT teams and a strong data loss prevention strategy. Wondering what’s top-of-mind for other security leaders when it comes to DLP? Download the report below.
Data Exfiltration ATO/BEC Email DLP Compliance
August Cybersecurity News Roundup
By Maddie Rosenthal
28 August 2020
The end of the month means another roundup of the top cybersecurity headlines. Keep reading for a summary of the top 12 stories from August. Bonus: We’ve included links to extra resources in case anything piques your interest and you want to take a deeper dive. Did we miss anything? Email madeline.rosenthal@tessian.com Russian charged with trying to recruit Tesla employee to plant malware  Earlier this week, news broke that the FBI had arrested Egor Igorevich Kriuchkov – a 27-year-old Russian citizen – for trying to recruit a fellow Tesla employee to plant malware inside the Gigafactory Nevada. The plan? Insert malware into the electric car maker’s system, causing a distributed denial of service (DDos) attack to occur. This would essentially give hackers free rein over the system.  But, instead of breaching the network, the Russian-speaking employee turned down Egor’s million-dollar offer (to be paid in cash or bitcoin) and instead worked closely with the FBI to thwart the attack. Feds warn election officials of potentially malicious ‘typosquatting’ websites Stories of election fraud have dominated headlines over the last several months. The latest story involves suspicious “typosquatting” websites that may be used for credential harvesting, phishing, and influence operations.
While the FBI hasn’t yet identified any malicious incidents, they have found dozens of illegitimate websites that could be used to interfere with the 2020 vote.   To stay safe, make sure you double-check any URLs you’ve typed in and never input any personal information unless you trust the domain.  Former Google engineer sent to prison for stealing robocar secrets An Insider Threat at Google who exfiltrated 14,000 files five years ago has been sentenced to 18 months in prison. The sentencing came four months after Anthony Levandowski plead guilty to stealing trade secrets, including diagrams and drawings related to simulations, radar technology, source code snippets, PDFs marked as confidential, and videos of test drives.  He’s also been ordered to pay more than $850,000. Looking for more information about the original incident? Check out this article: Insider Threats: Types and Real-World Examples. All the information you need is under Example #4. For six months, security researchers have secretly distributed an Emotet vaccine across the world Emotet – one of today’s most skilled malware groups – has caused security and IT leaders headaches since 2014.  But, earlier this year, James Quinn, a malware analyst working for Binary Defense, discovered a bug in Emotet’s code and was able to put together a PowerShell script that exploited the registry key mechanism to crash the malware. According to ZDNet, he essentially created “both an Emotet vaccine and killswitch at the same time.” Working with Team CYMRU, Binary Defense handed over the “vaccine” to national Computer Emergency Response Teams (CERTs), which then spread it around the world to companies in their respective jurisdictions. Online business fraud down, consumer fraud up New research from TransUnion shows that between March and July, hackers have started to change their tactics. Instead of targeting businesses, they’re now shifting their focus to consumers. Key findings include: Consumer fraud has increased 10%, while business fraud has declined 9% since the beginning of the pandemic Nearly one-third of consumers have been targeted by COVID-19 related fraud Phishing is the most common method used in fraud schemes You can read the full report here. FBI and CISA issue warning over increase in vishing attacks A joint warning from the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) and Cybersecurity Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was released in mid-August, cautioning the public that they’ve seen a spike in voice phishing attacks (known as vishing).  They’ve attributed the increase in attacks to the shift to remote working. Why? Because people are no longer able to verify requests in-person. Not sure what vishing is? Check out this article, which outlines how hackers are able to pull off these attacks, how you can spot them, and what to do if you’re targeted.  TikTok sues U.S. government over Trump ban In last month’s cybersecurity roundup, we outlined why India had banned TikTok and why America might be next. 30 days later, we have a few updates. On August 3, President Trump said TikTok would be banned in the U.S. unless it was bought by Microsoft (or another company) before September 15. Three days later, Trump signed an executive order barring US businesses from making transactions with TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance. The order will go into effect 45 days after it was signed. A few weeks later, ByteDance filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government, arguing the company was denied due process to argue that it isn’t actually a national security threat. In the meantime, TikTok is continuing its sales conversations with Microsoft and Oracle. Stay tuned next month for an update on what happens in the next 30 days. A Stanford deception expert and cybersecurity CEO explain why people fall for online scams According to a new research report – The Psychology of Human Error – nearly half of employees have made a mistake at work that had security repercussions. But why? Employees say stress, distraction, and fatigue are part of the problem and drive them to make more mistakes at work, including sending emails to the wrong people and clicking on phishing emails.  And, as you might expect, the sudden transition to remote work has only added fuel to the fire. 57% of employees say they’re even more distracted when working from home.  To avoid making costly mistakes, Jeff Hancock, a professor at Stanford, recommends taking breaks and prioritizing self-care. Of course, cybersecurity solutions will help prevent employees from causing a breach, too. University of Utah pays $457,000 to ransomware gang On August 21, the University of Utah posted a statement on its website saying that they were the victim of a ransomware attack and, to avoid hackers leaking sensitive student information, they paid $457,000. But, according to the statement, the hackers only managed to encrypt .02% of the data stored on their servers. While the University hasn’t revealed which ransomware gang was behind the attack, they have confirmed that the attack took place on July 19, that it was the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences that was hacked, and that the university’s cyber insurance policy paid for part of the ransom. Verizon analyzed the COVID-19 data breach landscape This month, Verizon updates its annual Data Breach Landscape Report to include new facts and figures related to COVID-19. Here some of the trends to look out for based on their findings: Breaches caused by human error will increase. Why? Many organizations are operating with fewer staff than before due to either illness or layoffs. Some staff may also have limitations because of new remote working set-ups. When you combine that with larger workloads and more distractions, we’re bound to see more mistakes. Organizations should be especially wary of stolen-credential related hacking, especially as many IT and security teams are working to lock down and maintain remote access.  Ransomware attacks will increase in the coming months. SANS Institute Phishing Attack Leads to Theft of 28,000 Records  The SANS institute – a global cybersecurity training and certifications organization – revealed that nearly 30,000 accounts of PII were compromised in a phishing attack that convinced an end-user to install a self-hiding and malicious Office 365 add-on. While no passwords or financial information were compromised and all the affected individuals have been notified, the breach goes to show that anyone – even cybersecurity experts – can fall for phishing scams. The cybersecurity skills shortage is getting worse In March, Tessian released its Opportunity in Cybersecurity Report which set out to answer one (not-so-simple) question: Why are there over 4 million unfilled positions in cybersecurity and why is the workforce twice as likely to be male than female? The answer is multi-faceted and has a lot to do with a lack of knowledge of the industry and inaccurate perceptions of what it means to work in cybersecurity.  The bad news is, it looks like the problem is getting worse. A recent report, The Life and Times of Cybersecurity Professionals 2020, shows that only 7% of cybersecurity professionals say their organization has improved its position relative to the cybersecurity skills shortage in the last several years. Another 58% say their organizations should be doing more to bridge the gap. What do you think will help encourage more people to join the industry?  That’s all for this month! Keep up with us on social media and check our blog for more updates.
Customer Stories Email DLP Integrated Cloud Email Security
9 Questions That Will Help You Choose The Right Email Security Solution
25 August 2020
When it comes to creating a cybersecurity strategy, security leaders have a lot to consider. There are various threat vectors, dozens of “types” of data to secure, thousands of products on the market, and oftentimes limited budget to work with. But, in this article, we’re going to focus on email security. Why? Because 90% of data breaches start on email. Data could be compromised via a spear phishing attack. Malware contained in one malicious attachment could infect an entire organization’s network. Insider threats could easily exfiltrate data for financial gain simply by emailing spreadsheets to their personal email accounts.   That’s why email is the threat vector security and IT leaders are most concerned about, and it’s why choosing the right email security software is so critically important. Keep reading to learn: What nine questions you should ask when choosing an email security solution  The solutions other security leaders across industries use to protect their people on email Why Tessian may be the right email security software for you How to get buy-in from your CEO after you’ve decided what the best solution is for your organization 1. Is it easy to deploy? Cybersecurity solutions should make life easier for your employees and your IT department. And, the bottom line is, a complicated setup process wastes time and resources. Worse still, it could lead to errors in deployment which may leave your company vulnerable. That’s why email security software must be easy to deploy across your organization and it should seamlessly integrate with a variety of email clients, all without any administrative burden. Before getting too far into the sales process, make sure you find out what support the vendor will provide, how long deployment takes, and – whenever possible – talk to an existing customer to find out how their deployment was.  2. Is it scalable and customizable? As your company grows and changes, your business tools must adapt. This includes email security software, which should work for you consistently, regardless of your company’s size. If you scale up or down, your email security software should change with you. Email security software must also allow customization so that it really aligns with your risk appetite, your employees’ preferences, and your specific business context. Too little flexibility is stifling — but too much choice is overwhelming (and could be resource-intensive).  3. Does it prevent a wide range of threats? Today, cybersecurity solutions must detect and prevent a broader range of threats than ever before. And, when it comes to email security software, you have to consider both inbound and outbound threats, including: Spear phishing: A sophisticated phishing attack in which the attacker emails a specific, named target. Verizon’s 2020 data breach report shows that 96% of social attacks (like spear phishing) occur via email. Check out more statistics related to social engineering attacks on our blog. Misdirected emails: An employee accidentally emails personal or sensitive data to the wrong recipient. This happens more often than you might think. The UK’s privacy regulator cited misdirected emails as the number one cause of data breaches in quarter four of 2019-20 and, according to Tessian platform data, over 800 emails are sent to the wrong person every year in organizations with 1,000 people.  Insider Threats: A trusted employee sends confidential or sensitive data to an unauthorized recipient. This recipient can be a third-party to whom a malicious insider is leaking intellectual property — or merely an employee forwarding correspondence to their personal email. Looking for more examples? We’ve rounded up 7 real-world Insider Threat examples here. 4. Can it keep up with the evolving threat landscape? Online threats are rapidly evolving and email security software is only as good as its ability to keep pace with these threats. Whether it’s vishing, smishing, or a new type of malware, hackers are always looking for new ways to take advantage of security vulnerabilities and unsuspecting (and often untrained) employees.  Can your email security software keep up? Tessian can. Scroll down to learn how Tessian uses machine learning to automatically “learn” and evolve in tandem with the threat landscape.  5. Are employees (and data) protected across devices? Businesses are increasingly reliant on cloud computing, remote working, and home offices — particularly since the outbreak of COVID-19. It’s hard enough to protect a set of company workstations located on company premises. Trying to manage security on any number of desktop, laptop, and mobile devices — located in offices, public places, and your employees’ homes — is even harder. But, unprotected devices represent a critical vulnerability in your company’s security. That’s why the right email security solution will work on any device that employees can use to access company data. 6. Is it easy to see (and communicate) ROI? It can be tough for security leaders to communicate the ROI of cybersecurity solutions. Why? Because it’s hard to put a value on something that hasn’t happened. But, a strong email security solution will make it easy for IT teams to assess risk, review trends over time, and create reports that demonstrate how risk is downtrending over time. This way, key stakeholders can really see the impact.  Unfortunately, a lot of solutions today are a black box when it comes to investigating incidents and garnering insights. So, when choosing an email security solution, consider what reporting tools the solution offers and whether or not any manual investigation is required. Most security teams are already thinly stretched; communicating ROI shouldn’t be an added burden. 7. Is it easy for employees to use? According to new research, 51% of employees say security tools and software impede their productivity. Likewise, 54% of employees say they’ll find a workaround if security software or policies prevent them from doing their job. This proves that the most secure path also has to be the path of least resistance. If the security solution you’re considering has high flag rates, creates extra work for your employees, or isn’t user-friendly, it will go unused. This is a security risk.  In layman’s terms: security shouldn’t get in the way. 8. Does it help ensure compliance?  Increasingly strict data privacy laws are setting new standards for companies handling personal information.  Businesses are accountable for taking a proactive approach to data security. You must take every reasonable step to ensure that the personal information in your control is kept safe and you must be able to demonstrate your security measures to regulators on demand.  That means that, when evaluating potential email security solutions, you should not only understand what data loss incidents they prevent, but also which security certifications they’ve earned.  9. Has it been vetted by relevant customers and industry leaders? Before selecting an email security software provider, you must ensure that it is well-established and has testimonials from previous customers, preferably in your company’s sector. Cybersecurity is a vast industry, and too many players are inexperienced, disreputable, or downright untrustworthy. You cannot afford to take any risks in choosing an email security software provider: reputation is everything in this field. Is Tessian the right email security solution for you?
Tessian is easy to deploy Deploying Tessian couldn’t be simpler. The software integrates with all email environments, including Office 365, Microsoft Exchange, and GSuite. And, plug-and-play intelligent filters make individual customization easy. Setup is also extremely fast. Within 24 hours, Tessian analyzes an entire year’s worth of your organization’s historic email data. Immediately afterward, you’re protected.  No rules are required.  Tessian is scalable and customizable Tessian’s stateful machine learning technology is always evolving, designed to suit your business’s needs as it scales and changes over time. Tessian automatically (and continuously) analyzes each employee’s historic email behavior to learn what is and isn’t “normal” for them. That way, it knows which emails to flag as anomalous.  But, we also understand how important customization is. With Tessian Constructor, you can create and implement security rules specific to your organization. Tessian prevents a wide range of threats Across three solutions, Tessian’s Human Layer Security platform can detect and prevent inbound and outbound threats, including advanced impersonation attacks, Insider Threats, and accidental data loss via misdirected emails. Tessian keeps pace with the evolving threat landscape Tessian doesn’t rely on a list of signatures of known malware and scams. Our machine learning algorithms are actively learning all the time, which enables Tessian Defender, Guardian, and Enforcer to spot unusual activity and discover new threats. And, with Human Layer Security Intelligence, Tessian customers benefit from a sort of “herd immunity”. If a threat is detected in another environment – for example, a never-before-seen social engineering attack – Tessian’s entire community of users will automatically be protected. How? The suspicious domain will automatically be placed on a “denylist” and blocked.  Tessian protects employees and data across devices Tessian is an ideal solution for remote or hybrid work environments. It protects your employees and your company’s data on laptops, desktops, and mobile devices. Tessian makes it easy to see ROI Tessian Human Layer Security Intelligence provides security leaders with detailed, easy-to-understand and – best of all – automated threat reports. In a single click, you’ll be able to see how your risk profile has improved over a certain period of time.
Security and IT teams can also get detailed information about specific incidents. Zero manual investigation required. Want to learn more about how Tessian customers can use HLSI to improve their security posture and communicate ROI? Read this: Introducing Tessian Human Layer Security Intelligence. Tessian is easy for employees to use Tessian is incredibly easy for anyone in your company to use. In fact, Tessian barely requires any “use” at all. The software runs silently in the background without any impediment to your employees’ productivity whatsoever. Flag rates are low, warnings – when triggered – are helpful, not annoying, and our customers see a very low number of false positives. With Tessian, the most secure path is the path of least resistance. It’s one piece of security software your employees will thank you for adopting.
Tessian helps ensure compliance The key to compliance with privacy law is assessing risks to privacy and taking reasonable steps to mitigate these risks. Email represents a critical risk area in any company’s data security architecture. Tessian can assist with compliance in a way that other email security software cannot. Tessian Guardian is unique in its ability to prevent misdirected emails, which are the leading cause of data breach, according to reports by the ICO and the California Attorney-General. Given that misdirected email is such a common cause of data breaches, you must take steps to safeguard against this risk.  But, it’s also important to note that Tessian was designed with security and privacy in mind. You can learn more about our security certifications and how we ensure data privacy and protection here.  Tessian has been vetted by industry leaders Leading organizations across industries rely on Tessian to protect their people and data on email.  Here are just some of the many businesses that endorse Tessian, by sector: Legal Customers Hill Dickinson (case study) Dentons (case study) Caplin and Drysdale (case study) Financial Services Customers Webb Henderson (case study) Man Group (case study) Evercore (case study) Tech Customers Rightmove (case study) Gubra (case study) Com Lauda (case study) Insurance Customers North (case study) Healthcare Customers Laya Healthcare (case study) Tessian has also received recognition and plaudits from industry bodies and tech experts.  In May 2020, Tessian was recognized as a Cool Vendor in the Gartner Cool Vendors in Cloud Office Security report, which recognizes security solutions that “focus specifically upon securing applications, communication and data that occur within cloud office environments.” Tessian has also been independently tested by IT analyst firm 451 Research, which assessed how the software fared against its competitors in data-loss prevention. According to 451 Research’s report, Tessian’s machine learning algorithms allow it to succeed in preventing data loss where rule-based solutions fall short. 
And, most recently, Tessian was included in Forrester’s Now Tech: Report for Enterprise Email Security Providers. You can read more about why Tessian was selected here.  While there is no one-size-fits-all approach to email security, this guide should help you research and vet which solution is right for you. If you’re considering Tessian, why not book a demo to have these questions (and more) answered by one of our experts.
Not ready to book a demo yet? Learn more about your products, our customers, and our Human Layer Security vision via the links below: Why Tessian? Our Technology What is Human Layer Security? Customer Stories  Bonus: If you have decided which email security solution is right for you but you’re struggling to get buy-in from your CEO, read this guide with tips from the world’s most innovative and trusted organizations.
Data Exfiltration ATO/BEC Email DLP Integrated Cloud Email Security
Research Shows Employee Burnout Could Cause Your Next Data Breach
By Laura Brooks
12 August 2020
Understanding how stress impacts your employees’ cybersecurity behaviors could significantly reduce the chances of people’s mistakes compromising your company’s security, our latest research reveals.   Consider this. A shocking 93% of US and UK employees told us they feel tired and stressed at some point during their working week, with one in 10 feeling tired every day. And perhaps more worryingly, nearly half (46%) said they have experienced burnout in their career.  Then consider that nearly two-thirds of employees feel chained to their desks, as 61% of respondents in our report said there is a culture of presenteeism in their organization that makes them work longer hours than they need to. Nearly 70% of employees also agreed that there is an expectation within their company to respond to emails quickly.  Employees are overwhelmed, overworked and are feeling the pressure to keep pace with their organization’s demands. 
The effects of the pandemic  The events of 2020 haven’t helped matters either. In the wake of the global pandemic, people have experienced extremely stressful situations that affected their health and finances, against a backdrop of political uncertainty and social unrest, while simultaneously juggling the demands of their jobs. The sudden shift to remote working also meant that people were surrounded by new distractions, and over half of respondents (57%) told us they felt more distracted when working from home.  According to Jeff Hancock, a professor at Stanford University who collaborated with us on this report, people tend to make mistakes or decisions they later regret when they are stressed and distracted. This is because when our cognitive load is overwhelmed, and when our attention is split between multiple tasks, we aren’t able to fully concentrate on the task in front of us. What does this mean for security?  Not only are these findings incredibly concerning for employees’ health and wellbeing, these factors could also explain why mistakes that compromise cybersecurity are happening more than ever. The majority of employees (52%) we surveyed said they make more mistakes at work when they are stressed.  !function(e,i,n,s){var t="InfogramEmbeds",d=e.getElementsByTagName("script")[0];if(window[t]&&window[t].initialized)window[t].process&&window[t].process();else if(!e.getElementById(n)){var o=e.createElement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js",d.parentNode.insertBefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async"); Younger employees seem to be more affected by stress than their older co-workers, though. Nearly two-thirds of workers aged 18-30 years old (62%) said they make more mistakes when they are stressed, compared to 45% of workers over 51 years old.  Our research also revealed that 43% and 41% of employees believe they are more error-prone when tired and distracted, respectively. In fact, people cited distraction as the top reason for why they fell for a phishing scam at work while 44% said they had accidentally sent an email to the wrong person (44%) because they were tired.  While these mistakes may seem trivial on the surface, phishing is the number one threat vector used by hackers today and one in five companies told us they have lost customers as a result of an employee sending an email to the wrong person. Far from red-faced embarrassment, these mistakes are compromising businesses’ cybersecurity.
The other problem is that hackers are preying on our vulnerable states, and using them to their advantage. Cybercriminals know people are stressed and looking for information about the pandemic and remote working. They know that some individuals are struggling financially and others have lost their jobs. The lure of a ‘too-good-to-be-true’ deal or ‘get a new job fast’ offer may suddenly look very appealing, especially if the email appears to have come from a trusted source, and cause people to click.  So what can businesses do to protect employees from mistakes caused by burnout?  Business and security leaders need to realise that it’s unrealistic for employees to act as the company’s first line of defence. You cannot expect every employee to spot every scam or make the right cybersecurity decision 100% of the time, particularly when they’re dealing with stressful situations and working in environments filled with distractions. When faced with never-ending to-do lists and back-to-back Zoom calls, cybersecurity is the last thing on people’s minds. In fact, a third of respondents told us they “rarely” or “never” think about security when at work.  Businesses, therefore, need to create a culture that doesn’t blame people for their mistakes and, instead, empowers them to do great work without security getting in the way. Understand how stress impacts people’s cybersecurity behaviors and tailor security policies and training so that they truly resonate for every employee.
Educating people on how hackers might take advantage of their stress and explaining the types of scams that people could be susceptible to is an important first step. For example, a hacker could impersonate a senior IT director, supposedly communicating the implementation of new software to accommodate the move back into the office, and asks employees to share their account credentials. Or a hacker may pose as a trusted government agency requesting personal information in relation to a new financial relief scheme.  Businesses should also implement solutions that can help employees make good cybersecurity decisions and reduce risk over time. Security solutions like Tessian use machine learning to understand employee behaviors to alert people to risks on email as and when they arise. By warning individuals in real-time, we can educate individuals as to why the email they were about to send or have received is a threat to company security. It helps to make people think twice before they do something they might regret.  With remote working here to stay, and with hackers continually finding ways to capitalize on people’s stress in order to manipulate them, businesses must prioritize cybersecurity at the human layer. Only by understanding why people make mistakes that compromise cybersecurity, can you begin to prevent burnout from causing your next data breach.
Customer Stories Email DLP Integrated Cloud Email Security
Data Leakage and Exfiltration: 7 Problems Tessian Helps Solve
03 August 2020
On Wednesday, July 29, Tessian hosted a webinar with two customers: Euromoney Institutional Investor and ERT. The topic? Data exfiltration and reduced visibility while workforces are remote. Martyn Booth, Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) at Euromoney Institutional Investor and Ted Crawford, Chief Information Officer (CIO) at ERT both offered incredible insights about how things have changed from a security perspective over the last four months and how Tessian has helped them lock down email, even before their employees started working from home. And, because Martyn and Ted are two security leaders in different industries (Financial Services and Tech/Healthcare respectively) and are based in different regions (England and The United States), they were able to share diverse opinions and experiences. Keep reading to learn more about how Tessian has helped them solve some of their biggest pain points.  7 Problems Tessian Helps Solve 1. Tessian prevents accidental data loss on email When you hear data exfiltration, what do you think of?  Many of you probably thought immediately about Insider Threats and other malicious activity. But, as our customers pointed out, most incidents involving data loss are accidental. Or, as Martyn put it, are the result of “naive email usage”. It could be an employee sending an email to the wrong person (we call this a misdirected email), it could be someone hitting “reply all”, or it could be someone emailing a spreadsheet to their personal email account to work on over the weekend.  Harmless, right? Not exactly. If these “accidents” involve sensitive information related to employees, customers, clients, or the company itself, it’s considered a breach.  Organizations can prevent all of the above with Tessian Guardian.  This is especially important now that employees are working remotely. Why? Because the lines between peoples’ personal and professional lives are blurred. Beyond that, people are distracted, stressed, and tired which, as we’ve shown in our latest research report The Psychology of Human Error, increases the likelihood that a mistake will happen. 2. Tessian prevents malicious data exfiltration on email While, many data loss incidents are accidental, some employees do intentionally exfiltrate data. There are a number of reasons why, but financial gain and a competitive edge are the most likely motivators.  Unfortunately, with so many people being laid off, made redundant, or furloughed, many organizations have seen a spike in this type of malicious activity. But, with Tessian Enforcer, organizations’ most sensitive data is kept safe.  Employees attempting to email sensitive information to themselves or a suspicious third-party will receive a warning message, explaining why the email has been flagged and asking if they’re sure they want to proceed. At the same time, security teams will get a notification.
Note: Instead of warning the employee and asking if they’d like to send the email anyway, security teams can easily configure Tessian to automatically quarantine emails that look like data exfiltration. Book a demo to see Tessian in action.  3. Tessian makes it easy to report security risks and communicate ROI  Communicating cybersecurity ROI has historically been a real challenge for security leaders. Not with Tessian. Martyn explained how Tessian enables him to share key results with executives and demonstrate the effectiveness of not just the solution, but his overall strategy. “One of the pillars of our infrastructure strategy was to build transparency across the organization. This comes from sharing metrics. With Tessian, we can show how many alerts were picked up and, each month, we can show the risk committee that we’re reducing the number of alerts. Now, are they actually interested in our preventative controls? I don’t think so. But the whole point of the metrics program is to show how well (or badly) our strategy is performing.  Before, they would make their decision based on cost or how much risk they thought we were going to be mitigating. It was quite subjective. We’ve moved that now into something more data-based. We can actually say “Well, actually, we pay x per year and, as a result of that, we’re going in the right direction in terms of our risk mitigations.” 4. Tessian helps organizations stay compliant  Both Healthcare and Financial Services are highly regulated industries that are bound to several compliance standards beyond GDPR.  That’s why, for Ted, protecting sensitive clinical data and ensuring “privacy and security by design” are both paramount. “There’s a lot of data that we need to protect and prevent from getting outside of the four walls of ERT,” he said. “As an offshoot of GDPR in 2018, we had to classify all of the data, determine from a privacy perspective how to treat it from a sensitivity perspective, and then decide how to treat it from a security perspective. Because it’s very easy to pull sensitive data and incur data loss on email, we needed a solution that would help us ensure data isn’t distributed where it shouldn’t go. That’s why we approached Tessian.” For more information about compliance in Financial Services, check out this article: Ultimate Guide to Data Protection and Compliance in Financial Services.
5. Tessian saves security teams time  While essential for compliance, classifying (and re-classifying) data, monitoring movement, investigating incidents, and generating reports all take a lot of time. That’s why 85% of IT leaders say rule-based DLP is admin-intensive.  With Tessian, security teams don’t have to do any of the above manually. This is a big selling point for Martyn, who said, “That’s where we really see the value with Tessian. It takes the burden off of people in my security team.” Tessian is powered by machine learning algorithms that have been trained on billions of data points. That means our solutions automatically understand what is and isn’t normal behavior for individual employees and can, therefore, detect and prevent threats before they turn into incidents or breaches. No rules required.  You can read more about our technology here.  6. Tessian gives security teams clear visibility of risks We’ve talked a lot about how Tessian detects and prevents risks. But for a solution to be really successful, it has to give security teams clear visibility of the risks in their organization. Tessian’s Human Layer Security platform does both.  With Tessian Human Layer Security Intelligence, our customers can easily and automatically get detailed insights into employee’s actions.  For example, imagine that in a single week, Tessian detects 12 different employees attempting to send sensitive information to their personal email accounts. When warned that sending the email is against company policy, nine of the employees opted to not send the email. The other three went ahead. Knowing this, security leaders can focus their efforts on the three that went ahead and offer additional, targeted training or, if necessary, they can escalate the incident to a line manager to issue a more formal warning.  This also helps predict future behavior. For example, if Tessian flags that an employee has sent upwards of 20 attachments – including Intellectual Property that would be valuable to a competitor – to a recipient he or she has no previous email history with soon after being denied a raise or promotion, security teams could infer that the employee is resigning and taking company data with them.  And, to prevent any further data exfiltration attempts, they can create custom filters specifically for that user, including customized warning messages or a filter that automatically blocks future exfiltration attempts. Before Tessian, this wasn’t possible for Martyn.  “Even if we suspected that an employee was going to go to a competitor and take data, we couldn’t check. We couldn’t see anything that was going up to the Cloud. It was all encrypted. The only way we would be able to see what people were emailing would be to actually go through individual emails to find ones that were problematic. We didn’t have time for that,” he said. 
7. Tessian helps reinforce training and improve employee’s security reflexes with in-the-moment warnings In the example above, three employees opted to send an email after being warned that doing so would be against company policy. But, what about the other nine? The warning message changed their behavior! It actually incentivized them to accurately mark emails as confidential or malicious if they were, in fact, confidential or malicious. This is really important. “You can’t take a ‘big bang’ approach to data privacy awareness training. To really see employees empowered, you have to constantly reinforce training,” Ted said.  The bottom line: For training to be effective long-term, employees need to apply what they learn to real-world situations and be reminded of policies in-the-moment. Over time, this will help improve their security reflexes and help build a more positive security culture.  Henry Trevelyan Thomas, the host of the webinar and Tessian’s Head of Customer Success, summarized the benefits of this for both employees and security leaders, “This is a really productive way to help employees take accountability for how they handle data. It democratizes security and takes some of the weight off of the Chief Information Security Officer’s shoulders.” Tessian can help prevent data exfiltration in your organization, too Tessian turns an organization’s email data into its best defense against inbound and outbound email security threats. Powered by machine learning, our Human Layer Security technology understands human behavior and relationships, enabling it to automatically detect and prevent anomalous and dangerous activity. Tessian Enforcer detects and prevents data exfiltration attempts Tessian Guardian detects and prevents misdirected emails Importantly, Tessian’s technology automatically updates its understanding of human behavior and evolving relationships through continuous analysis and learning of the organization’s email network. Oh, and it works silently in the background, meaning employees can do their jobs without security getting in the way.  Interested in learning more about how Tessian can help prevent accidental data loss and data exfiltration in your organization? You can read some of our customer stories here or book a demo.
ATO/BEC Email DLP Compliance
July Cybersecurity News Roundup
By Maddie Rosenthal
24 July 2020
If you keep up with cybersecurity news, you’ll know it’s been a busy month. We’ve seen headlines around social engineering attacks, the CCPA, coronavirus vaccine data, critical patches, and banned social media applications.  We’ve rounded up some of the top stories from July, including must-know information and links to various supporting resources.  Coronavirus: Russian Spies Target COVID-19 Vaccine Research After pharmaceutical companies and research centers in Great Britain were hacked, four agencies in the US, UK and Canada issued a joint warning, saying that Cozy Bear – a group that “almost certainly operate as a part of Russian intelligence services” – was responsible and that they were targeting organizations trying to develop a coronavirus vaccine. While the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) hasn’t revealed which organizations were targeted or whether any information had been stolen, they have made it clear that vaccine research wasn’t compromised.  In their warning, the US, UK, and Canadian agencies said that hackers not only exploited software flaws to gain access to computer systems, but they also used malware, and tricked employees into handing over login credentials with phishing and spear phishing attacks. Check out our guide: Coronavirus and Cybersecurity: How to Stay Safe From Phishing Attacks. Twitter Accounts Hacked in Bitcoin Scam On July 15, the official accounts of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Elon Musk, Bill Gates and other celebrities and politicians were hacked in an apparent Bitcoin scam. 
According to Twitter, it was a coordinated social engineering attack involving an Insider that targeted employees who had access to internal systems and tools. This access was then used to take control of various accounts. And, in an update from the social media giant on Wednesday, July 22, it was announced that cybercriminals didn’t just tweet from hacked accounts, they also accessed the direct messages of around 36 people, including a Dutch politician.  The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is now involved and other lawmakers (on both sides of the political spectrum) are asking Twitter for transparency into what happened and how it can be prevented in the future. Emotet Spam Trojan Surges Back to Life After 5 Months of Silence After going dark five months ago, 2019’s most active malware – Emotet botnet – is back. The latest campaign (the first attack was spotted on July 17) is firing off spam emails, trying to infect users in the US and the UK with its malware. According to one researcher, the campaign is “ongoing” and reached 250,000 messages in just one day.  Here’s how it works: malicious Word attachments or URLs are contained within emails and, if clicked by targets, Emotet will be downloaded and installed. This initial foothold is then used to deploy other malware. What do you do if you’re infected? Isolate the infected system and take the entire network offline.  15 Billion Usernames and Passwords are For Sale on The Dark Web We often say that data is valuable currency but, after a report was released in early July, we can see just how much our personal information is worth. The report, From Exposure to Takeover, found that 100,000 data breaches over a two-year period have yielded a 300% increase in stolen credentials. That means that, today, there are fifteen billion usernames and passwords for sale on the dark web. These compromised credentials are being sold for an average price of $15.43. But, hackers can “rent” an identity for as little as $10. So, how are hackers getting their hands on this data? Phishing, credential-stealing malware, and credit-card skimmers are three of the most popular ways. Research Shows How to Prevent Mistakes Before They Become Breaches  The Psychology of Human Error, the latest report from Tessian, examines not only the mistakes people make at work, but why they make those mistakes. These are important questions to answer, especially when the research shows that nearly half (43%) of employees say they’ve made a mistake at work that had security repercussions for themselves or their company. The findings reveal that younger employees are more likely to make mistakes, that men are more likely than women to fall for phishing scams, and that fast-paced company cultures are driving employees to make more mistakes. The research also outlines that those employees who are distracted (which many people are when working from home) or tired are more likely to fall for phishing scams.  Read the full report to learn more, including what security leaders can do to combat the problem. In a rush? You can read an overview of the key findings here. Microsoft Patches Critical 17-year-old DNS Bug in Windows Server As a part of Microsoft’s monthly security update – called Patch Tuesday – 123 security flaws across 13 products were fixed. The most severe? The flaw is known as CVE-2020-1350 Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, and points to a problem with Microsoft’s implementation of DNS that can result in a server improperly handling domain name resolutions requests.  Researchers say hackers can exploit this vulnerability and weaponize it to create wormable malware that would allow them to gain Domain Administrator rights and take control of an entire network. Patches are available for several versions of Windows Server, going back as far as 2003 and Microsoft has advised that organizations install the patch as soon as possible. Note: The vulnerability is limited to Microsoft’s Windows DNS Server implementation, so Windows DNS clients are not affected.   Biden Ups the Cybersecurity Game Ahead of Elections The 2016 election made it clear how important cybersecurity is in politics.  As a preventive measure, some (although very few) candidates’ in this year’s election have brought on Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs). The latest announcement came from Joe Biden who announced Chris DeRush – former CISO for the State of Michigan who has also served as a cybersecurity advisor in the White House and Department of Homeland Security – would fill the position for his presidential campaign.  Learn more about why political campaigns need CISOs on our blog.  India Has Banned TikTok. US May be Next TikTok – the popular social media application – has generated a lot of buzz throughout July. Why? According to a press release from India’s Ministry of Electronics & IT, it’s because the app (and 58 other Chinese-owned apps) are “hostile to national security” and “pose a threat to sovereignty”.  These concerns arose after a military stand-off between China and India in mid-June. Other countries are following suit. Both US and Australian authorities banned the use of the app for military personnel as more and more questions are being asked about the security of data and potential breaches of privacy.     Most recently, The House of Representatives voted 336-71 in favor of the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes an amendment banning TikTok from all federal devices. Meanwhile, TikTok  – who has recently hired an American CEO – has maintained that it doesn’t share data from its app with the Chinese government.  Walmart Accused of Mishandling Data in CCPA Lawsuit July 1 was the official enforcement data of the CCPA and, less than two weeks later, Walmart was sued in a class-action lawsuit. Why? A San Francisco man claims that his personal information – including his credit card – was sold on the dark web after the superstore was hacked.  Under the CCPA, companies can be fined up to $750 “per consumer per incident” and, because the man alleges that hundreds more customers were affected, Walmart could be hit with a big fine. For now, Walmart says it wasn’t hacked, maintaining that “Protecting our customers’ data is a top priority and something we take very seriously. We dispute the plaintiff’s allegations that the failure of our systems played any role in the public disclosure of his personally identifiable information (PII)”. That’s all for this month! Did we miss anything? Email madeline.rosenthal@tessian.com. You can also keep up with us on social media and check our blog for more updates. 
Data Exfiltration ATO/BEC Email DLP Integrated Cloud Email Security
Research Shows How To Prevent Mistakes Before They Become Breaches
By Maddie Rosenthal
22 July 2020
We all make mistakes. But with over two-fifths of employees saying they’ve made mistakes at work that have had security repercussions, businesses need to find a way to stop mistakes from happening before they compromise cybersecurity.  That’s why we developed our report The Psychology of Human Error, with the help of Jeff Hancock, a professor at Stanford University and expert in social dynamics online.  We wanted to understand why these mistakes are happening, rather than simply dismissing incidents of human error as people acting carelessly or labeling people the ‘weakest link’ when it comes to security. By doing so, we hope businesses can better understand how to protect their people, and the data they control.  Key findings: 43% of employees have made mistakes that have compromised cybersecurity A third of workers (33%) rarely or never think about cybersecurity when at work 52% of employees make more mistakes when they’re stressed, while 43% are more error-prone when tired 58% have sent an email to the wrong person at work and 1 in 5 companies lost customers after an employee sent a misdirected email  Read on to learn why this matters. You can also register for our webinar on August 19 here. We’ll be exploring key findings from the report with Jeff Hancock. You’ll walk away with a better understanding of how hacker’s are manipulating employees and what you can do to stop them. What mistakes are people making?  The majority of our survey respondents said they had sent an email to the wrong person, with nearly one-fifth of these misdirected emails ending up in the wrong external person’s inbox.  Far from just red-faced embarrassment, this simple mistake has devastating consequences. Not only do companies face the wrath of data protection regulators for flouting the rules of regulations like GDPR, our research reveals that one in five companies lost customers as a result of a misdirected email, because the trust they once had with their clients was broken. What’s more, one in 10 workers said they lost their job.  !function(e,i,n,s){var t="InfogramEmbeds",d=e.getElementsByTagName("script")[0];if(window[t]&&window[t].initialized)window[t].process&&window[t].process();else if(!e.getElementById(n)){var o=e.createElement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js",d.parentNode.insertBefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async"); Another mistake was clicking on links in phishing emails, something a quarter of respondents (25%) said they had done at work. This figure was significantly higher in the Technology industry however, with 47% of workers in this sector saying they’d fallen for phishing scams. It goes to show that even the most cybersecurity savvy people can make mistakes.  Interestingly, men were twice as likely as women to fall for phishing scams. While researchers aren’t 100% sure as to why gender differences play a factor in phishing susceptibility, our report does show that demographics play a role in people’s cybersecurity behaviors at work.  What’s causing these mistakes to happen?  1. Younger employees are 5x more likely to make mistakes 50% aged 18-30 years olds said they had made such mistakes with security repercussions for themselves or their organization. Just 10% of workers over 51 said the same.  This disparity, our report suggests, is not because younger workers are more careless. Rather, it may be because younger workers are actually more aware that they have made a mistake and are also more willing to admit their errors. For older generations, Professor Hancock explains, self-presentation and respect in the workplace are hugely important. They may be more reluctant to admit they’ve made a mistake because they feel ashamed due to preconceived notions about their generations and technology. Businesses, therefore, need to not only acknowledge how age affects cybersecurity behaviors but also find ways to deshame the reporting of mistakes in their organization. 2. 93% of employees are stressed and tired Employees told us they make more mistakes at work when they are stressed (52%), tired (43%), distracted (41%) and working quickly (36%).  This is concerning when you consider that an overwhelming 93% of employees surveyed said they were either tired or stressed at some point during the working week. This isn’t helped by the fact that nearly two-thirds of employees feel chained to their desks, with 61% saying there is a culture of presenteeism in their organization that makes them work longer hours than they need to.  The Covid-19 pandemic has put people under huge amounts of stress and change. In light of the events of 2020, our findings call for businesses to empathize with people’s positions and understand the impact stress and working cultures have on cybersecurity.
3. 57% of employees are being driven to distraction 47% of employees surveyed cited distraction as a top reason for falling for a phishing scam, while two-fifths said they sent an email to the wrong person because they were distracted.  With over half of workers (57%) admitting they’re more distracted when working from home, the sudden shift to remote-working could open businesses up to even more risks caused by human error. It’s hardly surprising. We suddenly had to set-up offices in the homes we share with our young children, pets and our housemates. There’s a lot going on, and mistakes are likely to happen. 
4. 41% thought phishing emails were from someone they trusted Over two-fifths of people (43%) mistakenly clicked on phishing emails because they thought the request was legitimate, while 41% said the email appeared to have come from either a senior executive or a well-known brand.  Over the past few months, we’ve seen hackers impersonating well-known brands and trusted authorities in their phishing scams, taking advantage of people’s desire to seek guidance and information on the pandemic. Impersonating someone in a position of trust or authority is a common and effective tactic used by hackers in phishing campaigns. Why? Because they know how difficult or unlikely it is to ignore a request from someone you like, respect or report into.  Businesses need to protect their people from these phishing scams. Educate staff on the ways hackers could take advantage of their circumstances and invest in solutions that can detect the impersonations, when your distracted and overworked employees can’t. !function(e,i,n,s){var t="InfogramEmbeds",d=e.getElementsByTagName("script")[0];if(window[t]&&window[t].initialized)window[t].process&&window[t].process();else if(!e.getElementById(n)){var o=e.createElement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js",d.parentNode.insertBefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async"); But how can businesses prevent these mistakes from happening in the first place?  To successfully prevent mistakes from turning into serious security incidents, businesses have to take a more human approach.  It’s all too easy to place the blame of data breaches on people’s mistakes. But businesses have to remember that not every employee is an expert in cybersecurity. In fact, a third of our survey respondents (33%) said they rarely or never think about cybersecurity when at work. They are focused on getting the jobs they were hired to do, done. !function(e,i,n,s){var t="InfogramEmbeds",d=e.getElementsByTagName("script")[0];if(window[t]&&window[t].initialized)window[t].process&&window[t].process();else if(!e.getElementById(n)){var o=e.createElement("script");o.async=1,o.id=n,o.src="https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js",d.parentNode.insertBefore(o,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async"); Training and policies help. However, combining this with machine intelligent security solutions – like Tessian – that automatically alert individuals of potential threats in real-time is a much more powerful tool in preventing mistakes before they turn into breaches.  Alerting employees to the threat in-the-moment helps override impulsive and dangerous decision-making that could compromise cybersecurity. By using explainable machine learning, we arm employees with the information they need to apply conscious reasoning to their actions over email, making them think twice before doing something they might regret. 
And with greater visibility into the behaviors of your riskiest and most at-risk employees, your teams can tailor security training and policies to influence and improve staff’s cybersecurity behaviors. Only by protecting people and preventing their mistakes can you ensure data and systems remain secure, and help your people do their best work. Read the full Psychology of Human Error report here.
Page