Hi Eva! I’m sure you’re celebrating GDPR’s first birthday this week. In general, do you think it’s been a positive step?
My general opinion is that GDPR’s been a very positive step in relation to the promotion of data subject rights. I certainly think that data protection legislation was ripe for change – developments in this field were long overdue. Importantly, our clients also see GDPR in a positive light, despite the potential for an increased administrative and compliance burden.
So what do you think the biggest benefits of GDPR have been?
In the last 12 months the GDPR has provided much-needed consistency when it comes to the protection of data across the continent (and beyond). Organizations used GDPR as an opportunity to “spring clean”, critically assessing their information security systems and processes and identifying opportunities for continued improvements.
In my experience, organizations are taking these changes very seriously, as are regulatory bodies. We have seen more reports of breaches to the ICO in the UK, and the EU has started to levy some blockbuster fines. Looking ahead, I see no reason why this trend would stop.
I also think that GDPR’s onset has been helpful in starting widespread debate in relation to data protection and privacy. Almost everyone now has at least some understanding of what GDPR does and what it means for people and business. Increased data literacy is enormously helpful, and this may have helped bump data protection and security up the priority list at board level.
What were the biggest challenges for Tessian in the build-up to GDPR?
As a relatively young company, Tessian was fairly fortunate in the run-up to GDPR as we didn’t have a huge archive of legacy data and systems. Mobilization and project management in larger organizations would likely have been much more difficult!
That being said, businesses of all sizes can still find it challenging to understand every piece of data that they hold: where data is located, whether it’s compliant with each of the major GDPR principles, and so on. The difference now with GDPR is that the penalties are potentially much more severe if you get it wrong.
To stay on the right side of GDPR, it’s so important to spend the time doing diligence on data flows and data mapping – understanding how data moves in and out of the organization, how it’s protected, and making sure that there are individuals taking responsibility and ownership of the issue internally. Even a year on, this requirement is still absolutely necessary.
So is this it now as far as GDPR goes? Or is there more still to be done?
It's been fascinating to see the global impact that GDPR has had. So far, we’re still yet to see the true extent of regulators’ “teeth” when it comes to fines. While there’s still more to come, the progress made in a year has been really encouraging.