DLP
Email Security: Best Practices and Tools to Lock Down Email
09 November 2020
What messaging channel has more users than Facebook and WeChat put together, has been around since 1971, and today is one of the biggest communications channels worldwide. You guessed it: email.  Today, there are around 3.9 billion email users around the world and, with steady annual growth of 3% expected, we should have 4.3 billion email users by 2022. But, email wasn’t designed to be secure which means that the data sent back and forth every day is at risk of being compromised.  The bottom line: It’s a serious security risk for businesses, which are now by-and-large bound to strict compliance standards. In fact, it’s the threat vector IT leaders are most concerned about protecting. Keep reading to find out what email security is, how data can be lost or breached on email, and what employees can do to prevent data loss on email.  If you’re looking for information about cybersecurity best practice while working remotely, check out our ultimate guide here.
But, why do organizations need to secure email? Because it’s “open” by nature. An unlocked door. That’s how it was designed! It actually started as an intra-organization chat tool.  
But an open network is an at-risk network. Anything can come in or go out.  Bad-intentioned hackers can send malicious attachments and malware-ridden into any organization, so long as they have the email address of just one employee.  Likewise, bad-intentioned employees can send sensitive data outside of an organization, simply by hitting “send”.  That’s why we have two categories of email security. Inbound email security: Inbound email security protects against threats like spam, phishing, spear phishing, and other advanced impersonation attacks.  Outbound email security: Outbound email security prevents data exfiltration and prevents accidental data loss via misdirected emails.  To really understand how email security works, you have to understand how email works, which we’ll cover next.  Not interested in the nitty gritty of email? Skip down the page to learn more about: The different types of email security solutions Best practice for email security How Tessian detects and prevents both inbound and outbound threats on email
Email 101: How does email work? Put simply, email operates by way of servers speaking with each other.  The framework that governs these communications is called Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP). SMTP is the protocol, which governs how servers send and receive packets of email data. The server sending an email will “push” the email to a receiving server. There are three key component parts of each email, all of which are to some extent based on traditional, physical mail. The envelope The envelope is the initial information pushed by the server sending an email to the receiving server. It simply indicates the email’s sender and recipient, as well as some validating commands exchanged between the sending and receiving servers. Email users can’t see the envelope, since it is part of the internal routing process for emails.  The header The email header, which is transmitted alongside the body of the email, contains metadata such as the time the email was sent, which servers sent and received the data, and so on. Email clients (such as Outlook, Gmail etc) hide header information from recipients. The body The body of an email is simply the content that a recipient sees and interacts with.  The envelope, the header and the body are all potential weak spots in organizations’ security perimeters. It is not difficult for an attacker in control of their own email server to spoof details of an email’s header, for instance, or to target an employee with a convincing impersonation of a trusted colleague or partner. (See other Tessian blogs for examples of display name and domain impersonation, which are regularly used to target enterprises and their employees in spear phishing campaigns.) So, what solutions exist to prevent inbound and outbound email threats?
Different types of email security solutions Secure Email Gateways Secure Email Gateways – also known as SEGs or Email Security Gateways – have been deployed by organizations for decades. SEGs offer an all-in-one solution that blocks spam, phishing, and some malware from reaching employees’ inboxes. They might use email encryption to make communications harder to intercept. As with DLP tools (see below), SEGs operate by way of extensive lists of rules that only defend against threats the system or organization has seen before.  SEGs use various methods to detect threats in emails. Generally, they inspect links and attachments, and apply rules to the email to raise suspicious characteristics (like if the email originates from a blacklisted IP address). Importantly, though, they can’t stop more advanced attacks like spear phishing. This is especially problematic because today, cybercriminals are using increasingly sophisticated social engineering tactics to bypass SEGs and trick end-users.  DLP Essentially, Data Loss Prevention (DLP) software ensures that organizations don’t leak sensitive data.  DLP software monitors different entry and exit points within a corporate network, such as user devices, email clients, servers and/or gateways within the network. Like SEGs, DLP tools are invariably rule-based, limiting the range of new and evolving threats DLP products can defend against. Interested in learning more? Check out these articles:  What is Data Loss Prevention? A Complete Overview of DLP on Email The State of Data Loss Prevention 2020 The Drawbacks of Traditional DLP on Email SPF / DKIM / DMARC SPF, DKIM and DMARC are email authentication records that, in short, help protect organizations against attackers spoofing their domains. Although they can help stop spoofing attempts, the effectiveness of these protocols is limited by their lack of adoption. The vast majority of organizations around the world have not yet implemented DMARC, which means attackers can easily target vulnerable companies and spoof their domains. (For more information, head to Tessian’s blog on DMARC.) Given the shortcomings of these traditional solutions, security leaders must educate their employees on best practice so that they’re well-equipped to defend against email attacks and prevent data loss (both accidental and malicious).
Best practices for email security
Here are a few key strategies virtually all organizations can employ to help them defend against cyber threats on email. Password protection Even when organizations and attackers are in a cybersecurity arms race, the basics of good security still apply. Email accounts need strong passwords: a good guideline is that if you can remember your password, it isn’t strong enough. If your organization uses a password management tool like Lastpass or 1Password, make sure all passwords are stored on that system. Top tip: You should also consider implementing 2Fa. Manage sensitive information carefully Organizations control all kinds of sensitive data, and the popularity (and necessity) of newly flexible working habits means that security leaders need to be especially vigilant as to how data moves inside and outside organizations’ networks. To control the flow of data, organizations implement policies and procedures, including access controls.  But, these controls and human policies can impede productivity. In fact, 51% say security tools and software impede their productivity. Another 54% of employees say they’ll find a workaround if security software or policies prevent them from doing their job. Leverage technology to train employees Training and awareness is regularly talked up among cybersecurity practitioners.  The problem is, taking employees away from their day-to-day duties and delivering context-free workshops on cybersecurity will rarely result in better vigilance and lasting threat protection. It’s important to invest in technology that can deliver in-situ, contextual training, allowing employees to learn from activity taking place in their own inboxes. You can read more about the Pros and Cons of Security Awareness Training here. While password protection, access controls, policies, and training can all help improve an organization’s email security, they alone aren’t enough. After all, to err is human! That’s why we can’t leave people as the last line of defense. And, since traditional email security solutions like SEGs and rule-based DLP can’t stop more advanced threats, security teams need to look at next-generation technology like Tessian. 
How does Tessian detect and prevent inbound and outbound threats on email? Tessian’s approach to email security is different. We call it Human Layer Security and, across three solutions, we prevent data exfiltration, accidental data loss, and spear phishing attacks. Powered by machine learning, Tessian maps employee email activity and builds unique security identities for every individual. Our algorithms can then predict when inbound and outbound email activity is normal or abnormal and detect potential security incidents before they become breaches. No rules required. We secure hundreds of thousands of employees at some of the world’s leading enterprises. But, don’t take our word for it. Take it from them! We have dozens of customer stories. Or, if you’re interested in learning more about how Tessian can help your organization level-up its email security, speak to one of our experts today.
Data Exfiltration DLP Human Layer Security Spear Phishing
October Cybersecurity News Roundup
30 October 2020
October 2020 has been another remarkable month in cybersecurity. And, since COVID-19 sent the world indoors and made us ever-more reliant on the internet, the importance of information security and data protection has never been more apparent. October saw numerous high-profile data breaches, cyberattacks, and online scams — but also brought us one of the biggest GDPR fines yet, an innovative solution to deepfake technology, and even more jostling between the US government and Chinese big tech. Let’s take a look at the biggest cybersecurity headlines of October 2020. Paying Cyberattack Ransoms Could Breach International Sanctions Rules New guidance from the US Treasury has big implications for companies hit by ransomware attacks from certain countries. (Companies affected by ransomware find their files encrypted — replaced by useless strings of seemingly random characters — with cybercriminals promising to return the data if the company pays a ransom.) Paying up might be the least-worst option where a company’s critical data is at stake…ut according to an October 1 US Treasury advisory note, paying cyberattack ransoms could violate legal rules on international sanctions. Businesses suffering a ransomware attack by hackers from a sanctioned country — like Iran, China, or Russia (where many such attacks do originate) — now face the threat of huge fines and legal action if they choose to buy back their files.  The Treasury’s advice reiterates what cybersecurity leaders have been saying for many years: in cybersecurity, prevention is far better than cure. Amazon Prime Day Sees Huge Spike in Phishing Scams With millions of consumers confined to their homes, this year’s Amazon Prime Day was a chance for millions of shoppers to grab a bargain — and an unmissable opportunity for cybercriminals to steal their personal information. October 8 research from Bolster detected over 800 “spoof” Amazon webpages in September (up from 50 in January), as fraudsters ramped up their phishing efforts in anticipation of the two-day Amazon Prime Day event, hosted October 13-14. Some sites looked near-identical to Amazon’s genuine web properties, with perfectly duplicated branding and convincing domain names. Unwary shoppers were asked for details such as their CVV2 code and social security number. See what advice Tessian co-founder and CEO, Tim Sadler, offered consumers in Tech Radar. FBI Warns of Ransomware Attacks Targeting Healthcare Providers On October 29, the FBI and other agencies issued a warning regarding an “increased and imminent cybercrime threat to US hospitals and healthcare providers.” The threats include a new tool named anchor_dns, a backdoor that can reportedly “evade typical network defense products,” and the Ryuk Ransomware. Among other measures, the FBI is advising healthcare providers to create business continuity plans, patch networked systems, and implement multi-factor authentication in preparation for an attack. According to Associated Press, 59 US healthcare systems have been attacked via ransomware so far this year. Looking for more information on why the healthcare industry is especially vulnerable? We talk more about The State of Data Loss Prevention in Healthcare in this article. UK Public Body Unable to Provide Services Follow “Serious Cyberattack” On October 14, Hackney London Borough Council, a UK local government body, announced that it had fallen victim to a “serious cyberattack.”  In an update two days later, the council revealed the extent of the damage. Among other things, the council was unable to accept rent payments, process planning applications, or pay some social security benefits. The council said it was “working hard to restore services, protect data, and investigate the attack,” but that services could remain unavailable for “some time.” UK Data Regulator Issues $26 Million Fine to Airline UK airline British Airways received a £20 million ($26 million) fine on October 17 for “failing to protect the personal and financial details of more than 400,000 of its customers.” The fine relates to a cyberattack suffered by the company in 2018. The Information Commissioner’s Office — the UK’s data protection authority — found that the airline had failed to limit access to data, had not undertaken sufficiently rigorous testing, and should have implemented multi-factor authentication on its employee and third-party accounts. The British Airways fine amounts to the fourth-largest GDPR fine of all time — but the airline actually got off relatively lightly, considering that the fine was initially touted as £183 million ($238 million).  To learn more about compliance standards like the GDPR (including the largest breaches and fines to-date) check out The CEO’s Guide to Data Protection and Compliance. Adobe Launches Content Authenticity Initiative Tool to Fight Deepfakes As video and audio manipulation techniques become more accessible, cybersecurity and intelligence experts have been warning about a potential onslaught of deepfakes that could have an unprecedented impact on security, politics, and society. Not sure what a deepfake is? Read this article. Cybercriminals can use deepfake technology to create video or audio clips of high-profile and trusted individuals. Deepfakes have already been used in phishing attacks and could also be used for blackmail and disinformation campaigns. On October 20, Adobe’s Content Authenticity Initiative announced a new tool that will add “a secure layer of tamper-evident attribution data to photos, including the author’s name, location, and edit history” to help creatives authenticate their content. Once deepfakes are sufficiently convincing, there might be no way to distinguish them from genuine material. Adobe’s project marks a promising first step in this emerging security front. Hackers Discover 55 Vulnerabilities Across Apple’s Systems A group of hackers earned $300,000 via Apple’s bug bounty scheme after identifying 55 vulnerabilities across Apple’s infrastructure. The security issues included vulnerabilities that would have allowed an attacker to “(take) over a victim’s iCloud account,” “fully compromise an industrial control warehouse software used by Apple,” and “access management tools and sensitive resources.” The group said Apple had fully addressed the majority of vulnerabilities reported. Around 3 Million Credit Cards Compromised After Breach at US Restaurant Franchise On Oct 12, details of around 3 million credit cards were posted on the dark web following a huge data breach at US restaurant franchise Dickey’s Barbeque Pit. According to an investigation by Gemini Advisory, 156 of 469 Dickey’s outlets were involved in the breach, with the highest levels of exposure present in California. The details appear to have been stolen between July 2018 and August 2020. Given California’s strict data breach rules, including a private right of action under the California Consumer Privacy Act, Dickey’s could be liable for some eye-watering sums if the breach is found to have resulted from lax cybersecurity practices. Questions about the CCPA? We answer 13 of them in this article: CCPA FAQs: Your Guide to California’s New Privacy Law. Russia Planned to Launch 2020 Olympics Cyberattack The GRU, Russia’s military intelligence agency, “conducted cyber reconnaissance against officials and organizations” involved in the Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games, according to a UK government announcement on October 19. Russian cybercrime groups are alleged to have targeted “organizers, logistics services, and sponsors.” The Games were originally due to tale place this summer but were postponed due to COVID-19.  The UK government also revealed the full extent of Russia’s hacking campaign against the 2018 Winter Games, during which Russian hackers are alleged to have disguised themselves as Chinese and North Korean attackers to target the opening ceremony in Seoul, South Korea. ENISA 2020 Threat Landscape Report Shows Increase in Cyberattacks  The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) released its 2020 Threat Landscape Report on October 20, and cybersecurity leaders (unfortunately) won’t be surprised at its conclusion: cybercrime is on the increase. The report cites “a new norm,” triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic, in which the world is even more dependent on “a secure and reliable cyberspace.” ENISA found that the number of phishing victims “continues to grow,” that Business Email Compromise (BEC) resulted in “the loss of millions of euros,” and that state-sponsored actors are propagating “finely targeted and persistent attacks on high-value data.” If you’re a security leader looking for solutions to these problems, click here to learn more about how Tessian Defender detects advanced impersonation attacks that slip past SEGs, native features, and legacy tools. Researcher Breaches US President’s Twitter Account By Guessing Password Dutch “ethical hacker” Victor Gevers found himself in control of Donald Trump’s Twitter account on October 16 after guessing the US president’s password. Trump’s Twitter account has over 87 million followers and is frequently used to deliver messages of international importance. Gevers said he correctly guessed the password, “maga2020!”, after seven attempts. The incident reveals that the president was using a simple, easy-to-guess password, and that he had multi-factor authentication disabled. Rectifying either of these two basic security errors would have prevented unauthorized access to the account. Overruling of WeChat Ban Denied by California Judge Another month, another development in the long-running battle between the US government and Chinese tech firms. On October 23, California struck a blow to the Trump administration’s efforts to restrict WeChat — a Chinese app used for currency transfers, social networking, and instant messaging. In September, the US Department of Commerce ordered Apple and Google to stop distributing WeChat via their app stores, citing security issues. The order was blocked in California following a legal challenge by WeChat. The US Justice Department brought further evidence and asked the court to reverse its WeChat ruling. The court declined to change its decision, meaning that the Commerce Department’s banning order will remain unenforced in California — despite the federal government’s allegations regarding WeChat’s security issues.  Finnish Therapy Center Hacked, Exposing Patient Data One of the most shocking data breaches of 2020 was brought to light on October 24, when Finnish psychotherapy center Vastaamo revealed a hack that compromised hundreds of patient records. The highly sensitive nature of the breach means that it is being taken extremely seriously. Finland’s interior minister summoned a cabinet meeting to determine how best to respond to the breach, promising “speedy crisis help” to the affected individuals. The hackers are demanding a ransom in exchange for the return of the files, which were reportedly accessed between November 2018 and March 2019. The ransomware attack further suggests that businesses worldwide lack proper cybersecurity infrastructure — even when handling highly sensitive and valuable data. That’s all for this month. If we missed anything, please email [email protected] and stay tuned for the next roundup. Don’t forget: You can easily share this on social media via the buttons at the top right of this post. 
Customer Stories Data Exfiltration DLP Human Layer Security Spear Phishing
How Tessian Is Preventing Breaches and Influencing Safer Behavior in Healthcare
By Maddie Rosenthal
28 October 2020
Company: Cordaan Industry: Healthcare Seats: 6,300 Solutions: Guardian, Enforcer, Defender  About Cordaan Cordaan – one of the largest healthcare providers in Amsterdam – provides care to over 20,000 people from 120 locations across Amsterdam. They do this with the help of 6,000 employees and more than 2,500 volunteers. Cordaan also works in association with research institutes and social organizations.  To help protect the organization’s people, sensitive data, and networks, Cordaan has deployed Tessian Guardian, Enforcer, and Defender to protect over 6,300 employees on email.  Tessian solves three key problems for Cordaan, which we explore in detail in the video below. Keep reading for a summary of the discussion. Problem: Healthcare employees are especially vulnerable to inbound attacks  When it comes to inbound attacks like spear phishing and business email compromise, the healthcare industry is among the most targeted. It also has the highest costs associated with data breaches. Why? According to Cas de Bie, the Dutch healthcare provider’s Chief Information Officer, it’s not just because organizations operating in this industry handle highly sensitive data. It also has a lot to do with the very nature of the work: helping people. 
Combine this empathetic approach with the stress of a global pandemic, and you’re left with an incredibly vulnerable workforce. With Tessian, Cas is now confident Tessian will identify spear phishing emails before his employees respond to them and that employees’ workflow won’t be disrupted in the process.  When talking about inbound attacks, Cas said “It’s all about awareness. While people probably do know what they’re supposed to do when it comes to email security, it’s different in real life. It’s hard to decide in the moment. Of course, they don’t do it on purpose. They want to make the right decision. Tessian helps them do that.” Problem: Reactive and rule-based solutions weren’t preventing human error on email in the short or long-term To ensure GDPR-compliance, Cordaan prioritized investment in privacy and security solutions. But, according to Cas, “standard” email security, spam filtering solutions, and encryption alone just weren’t enough. They weren’t keeping malicious emails out of inboxes, and they weren’t preventing data loss from insiders. They also weren’t doing anything to improve employee security reflexes in the long-term. 
So, to level-up Cordaan’s email security, Cas was looking for a solution that was: Technologically advanced User-friendly Proactive With Tessian, he found all three. Powered by contextual machine learning and artificial intelligence, our solutions can detect and prevent threats and risky behavior before they become incidents or breaches. How? With the in-the-moment warnings – triggered by anomalous email activity – that look something like this.
These warnings help nudge well-intentioned employees towards safer behavior and ensure data stays within Cordaan’s perimeter. And, because Tessian works silently in the background and analyzes inbound and outbound emails in milliseconds, it’s invisible to employees until they see a warning.   This was incredibly important to Cas, who said that “The added value of Tessian is that it influences behavior. That really resonated with the board and helped me make a strong business case. While I can’t show how cybersecurity creates revenue, I can show – via a risk management calculation – the potential fines we could avoid because of our investment in Tessian”.  Problem: Cordaan’s security team had limited visibility into – and control over – data loss incidents on email  While Cordaan had invested in other email security solutions, Cas and his team still lacked visibility into the frequency of data loss incidents on email. But, after deploying Tessian for a Proof of Value, the scope of the problem became crystal clear.
The reality is that employees do actually send unauthorized and misdirected emails more frequently than expected. (We explore this in detail in our report, The State of Data Loss Prevention 2020.) But, the good news is that this behavior can be influenced and corrected—all without access restrictions that make it harder (or impossible) for employees to do their jobs.  Cas explained it well, saying that “Of course there are things that we have to police and prohibit. But, most of the time, people aren’t doing things maliciously. So it’s nice that – with Tessian – we can take a more nuanced approach. We can influence behavior and help our employees do the right thing.” Learn more about how Tessian prevents human error on email Powered by machine learning, Tessian’s Human Layer Security technology understands human behavior and relationships. Tessian Guardian automatically detects and prevents misdirected emails Tessian Enforcer automatically detects and prevents data exfiltration attempts Tessian Defender automatically detects and prevents spear phishing attacks Importantly, Tessian’s technology automatically updates its understanding of human behavior and evolving relationships through continuous analysis and learning of an organization’s email network. That means it gets smarter over time to keep you protected, wherever and however your work. Interested in learning more about how Tessian can help prevent email mistakes in your organization? You can read some of our customer stories here or book a demo.
Data Exfiltration DLP Human Layer Security Spear Phishing
Tessian Included as a Cloud Email Security Supplement Solution in Gartner’s 2020 Market Guide for Email Security
By Maddie Rosenthal
27 October 2020
Gartner recently released its Market Guide for Email Security and Tessian is thrilled to have been included as a representative vendor for Cloud Email Security Supplement Solutions. So, what does that mean? According to the report, representative vendors offer “email security capabilities in ways that are unique, innovative, and/or demonstrate forward-looking product strategies.”  How has the threat landscape changed? According to Gartner’s guide, there are a number of factors related to the market’s direction that security leaders need to consider, including the ways in which hackers are targeting organizations and how (and where) we work. Keep reading to learn more. Email is the #1 threat vector
As noted in the report, “According to the 2020 Verizon Data Breach report, 22% of breaches involved social engineering, and 96% of those breaches came through email. In the same report, another 22% of breaches were a result of “human failure” errors, where sensitive data was accidentally sent to the wrong recipient.” “Business email compromise (BEC), the takeover or fraudulent use of a legitimate account to divert funds, continues to grow, and simple payroll diversion scams accounted for  $8 million in 2019.” The bottom line: Whether it’s protecting against inbound threats like ransomware attacks, business email compromise (BEC), or account takeover (ATO) or outbound threats like accidental and malicious data exfiltration, security leaders need to prioritize email security and reevaluate the effectiveness of current solutions. This is especially pertinent as many organizations have moved to the cloud.    Increased cloud office adoption According to Gartner, “Enterprise adoption of cloud office systems, for which cloud email is a key capability, is continuing to grow, with 71% of companies using cloud or hybrid cloud email.” We can expect these numbers to rise, especially given the sudden shift to remote working set-ups in response to COVID-19 and the steep and steady rise in the use of mobile devices for work. But, there’s a problem. Despite G Suite and O365’s basic security controls as well as anti-spam, anti-phishing, and anti-malware services; advanced attachment; and URL-based threat defenses, “email threats have become sophisticated to evade detection by common email security technologies, particularly those that rely only on standard antivirus and reputation.”
What capabilities set vendors apart?  So, what capabilities set vendors apart? In other words what capabilities should security leaders be looking for? Gartner recommends that security leaders “invest in anti-phishing technology that can accurately detect BEC and account takeover attacks. In particular, seek solutions that use AI to create a baseline for communication patterns and conversation style and detect anomalies in these patterns. For account take over attacks, seek solutions that use computer vision when reviewing suspect URLs. Adjacent technologies such as multifactor authentication are used to protect against account takeover attacks.”.   Gartner also says “the following capabilities can be used as primary differentiators and selection criteria for email”. These include the ability to: “Protect against attachment-based threats” “Protect against URL-based advanced threats”  “Protect Against Impersonation and Social Engineering Tactics Used in URL-Based, Attachment-Based and Payloadless Advanced Threats” And, to help security leaders narrow down their search, Gartner identified specific categories of vendors that provide some of the above email capabilities. Tessian is recognized as a representative vendor for CESSs.  Keep reading to learn more about our products and technology.  Why Tessian?  Tessian Human Layer Security offers both inbound and outbound protection on email and satisfies criteria outlined in the report, including display name spoof detection, lookalike domain detection, anomaly detection, data protection, post delivery protection, and offers these protection for both web and mobile devices. Here’s how. Powered by machine learning, our Human Layer Security platform understands normal email behavior by analyzing content, context, and communication patterns from historical email data to establish trusted relationship graphs. Tessian can then detect anomalies in real-time using those employee relationship graphs alongside deep content analysis, natural language processing, and behavioral analysis. Tessian Guardian automatically detects and prevents accidental data loss from misdirected emails Tessian Enforcer automatically detects and prevents data exfiltration attempts and ensures compliant email activity Tessian Defender automatically detects and prevents spear phishing, Business Email Compromise and other advanced targeted impersonation attacks. Tessian’s technology updates its understanding of human behavior and evolving relationships through continuous analysis and learning of the organization’s email network without hands-on maintenance from security teams. That means it gets smarter over time to keep you protected, wherever and however you work, whether that’s a desktop computer in the office or a mobile device, tablet, or laptop at home. But Tessian doesn’t just detect and prevent threats.  When a security threat is triggered, contextual warnings provide employees with in-the-moment training on why an email was flagged unsafe (or an impersonation attempt)  or reinforce data security policies and procedures and improve their security reflexes. This nudges employees towards safer behavior in the long-term.  And, with Human Layer Security Intelligence, security and compliance leaders can get greater visibility into the threats prevented, track trends, and benchmark their organization’s security posture against others. This way, they can continuously reduce Human Layer risks over time. To learn more about how Tessian protects world-leading organizations across G Suite, O365, and Outlook, check out our customer stories or book a demo. 
Gartner, Market Guide for Email Security, September 2020 Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
Compliance DLP
11 Biggest GDPR Fines of 2020 (So Far)
15 October 2020
Since the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) was introduced in 2018, countless organizations have made headlines for violations. British Airways, Marriot International Hotels, Austrian Post…but what about this year?  Keep reading to find out how many fines have been handed out in 2020, which organizations have been slapped with the biggest fines, why, and how the violation could have been prevented.  Key findings include: Google received the biggest fine so far in 2020 – €50 million ($56.6 million) Over 220 fines have been handed out for GDPR violations in the first ten months of 2020 The total amount of fines issued so far in 2020 exceeds €175 million Between 2018 and 2019, the average number of fines issues per month increased by 260% July 2020 saw the highest number of fines issued in a single month since the GDPR was introduced – a total of 45 Only 20% of US, UK, and EU companies are fully GDPR compliant Misdirected emails have been the primary cause of data loss reported to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO)
More and more GDPR fines are being issued  As of October 2020, over 220 fines have been handed out for GDPR violations. Based on trends from the last 24 months, we can expect this number to continue rising.  Between July 2018 and June 2019, an average of 5 fines were handed out each month. But, between July 2019 and June 2020, an average of 18 fines were handed each month. That’s a 260% increase. And, with 45 fines issued for non-compliance in October 2020 alone, it’s clear that the EU authorities take information security and compliance very seriously. But, do organizations? Maybe not… Research suggests that only 20% of US, UK, and EU companies are fully GDPR compliant and – worse still – a whopping 30% of companies have yet to even start their GDPR compliance initiatives. Ensuring compliance is key, though, especially when organizations can be fined up to €20 million (just short of $23 million) or 4% of annual global turnover (whichever is larger) for a violation. The biggest GDPR fines of 2020 so far With two months to go, we have already seen fines that shatter records set in previous years. Here are the biggest GDPR fines of 2020 so far: 1. Google – €50 million ($56.6 million)  Although Google’s fine is technically from last year, the company lodged an appeal against it. Last month, however, judges at France’s top court for administrative law dismissed Google’s appeal and upheld the eye-watering penalty.  Google was hit with this GDPR fine – the largest one to date – for multiple infractions under Articles 5, 6, 13, and 14. While each violation is slightly different, the long and short of it is that Google wasn’t transparent in divulging how they harvested and used data for ad targeting.  How the violation(s) could have been avoided: Google should have provided more information to users in consent policies and should have granted them more control over how their personal data is processed. 2. H&M — €35 million ($41 million) On October 5, the Data Protection Authority of Hamburg, Germany, fined clothing retailer H&M €35,258,707.95 — the second-largest GDPR fine ever imposed. H&M’s GDPR violations involved the “monitoring of several hundred employees.” After employees took vacation or sick leave, they were required to attend a return-to-work meeting. Some of these meetings were recorded and accessible to over 50 H&M managers. Senior H&M staff gained ”a broad knowledge of their employees’ private lives… ranging from rather harmless details to family issues and religious beliefs.” This “detailed profile” was used to help evaluate employees’ performance and make decisions about their employment. How the violation(s) could have been avoided: Details of the decision haven’t been published, but the seriousness of H&M’s violation is clear. H&M appears to have violated the GDPR’s principle of data minimization — don’t process personal information, particularly sensitive data about people’s health and beliefs, unless you need to for a specific purpose. H&M should also have placed strict access controls on the data, and the company should not have used this data to make decisions about people’s employment. 3. TIM – €27.8 million ($31.5 million) Just two weeks into the new year on January 15, Italian telecommunications operator TIM (or Telecom Italia) was stung with a €27.8 million GDPR fine from Garante, the Italian Data Protection Authority, for a series of infractions and violations that have accumulated over the last several years.  TIM’s infractions include a variety of unlawful actions, most of which stem from an overly-aggressive marketing strategy. Millions of individuals were bombarded with promotional calls and unsolicited communications, some of whom were on non-contact and exclusion lists.   How the violation(s) could have been avoided: TIM should have managed lists of data subjects more carefully and created specific opt-ins for different marketing activities.   4. British Airways – €22 million ($26 million) In October, the ICO hit British Airways with a $26 million fine for a breach that took place in 2018. This is considerably less than $238 million dollar fine that the ICO originally said it intended to issue back in 2019.  So, what happened back in 2018? British Airway’s systems were compromised. The breach affected 400,000 customers and hackers got their hands on log in details, payment card information, and PI like travellers’ names and addresses.   How the violation(s) could have been avoided: According to the ICO, the attack was preventable, but BA didn’t have sufficient security measures in place to protect their systems, networks, and data. In fact, they didn’t even have basics like multi-factor authentication in place at the time of the breach. Going forward, the airline should take a data-first security approach, invest in security solutions, and ensure they have strict data privacy policies and procedures in place. 5. Marriott – €20.4 million ($23.8 million) While this is an eye-watering fine, it’s actually significantly lower than the $123 million fine the ICO originally said they’d levy. So, what happened? 383 million guest records (30 million EU residents) were exposed after the hotel chain’s guest reservation database was compromised. PI like guests’ names, addresses, passport numbers, and payment card information was exposed.  Note: The hack originated in Starwood Group’s reservation system in 2014. While Marriott acquired Starwood in 2016, the hack wasn’t detected until September 2018. How the violation(s) could have been avoided: The ICO found that Marriott failed to perform adequate due diligence after acquiring Starwood. They should have done more to safeguard their systemswith a stronger data loss prevention (DLP) strategyand utilized de-identification methods.  6. Wind — €17 million ($20 million) On July 13, Italian Data Protection Authority imposed a fine of €16,729,600 on telecoms company Wind due to its unlawful direct marketing activities. The enforcement action started after Italy’s regulator received complaints about Wind Tre’s marketing communications. Wind reportedly spammed Italians with ads — without their consent — and provided incorrect contact details, leaving consumers unable to unsubscribe. The regulator also found that Wind’s mobile apps forced users to agree to direct marketing and location tracking and that its business partners had undertaken illegal data-collection activities.  How the violation(s) could have been avoided:Wind should have established a valid lawful basis before using people’s contact details for direct marketing purposes. This probably would have meant getting consumers’ consent — unless it could  demonstrate that sending marketing materials was in its “legitimate interests.” For whatever reason you send direct marketing, you must ensure that consumers have an easy way to unsubscribe. And you must always ensure that your company’s Privacy Policy is accurate and up-to-date. 7. Google – €7 million ($7.9 million) It has not been a good year for Google. In March, the Swedish Data Protection Authority of Sweden (SDPA) fined Google for neglecting to remove a pair of search result listings under Europe’s “right to be forgotten” rules under the GDPR, which the SDPA ordered the company to do in 2017.  How the violation(s) could have been avoided: Google should have fulfilled the rights of data subjects, primarily their  right to be forgotten. This is also known as the right to erasure. How? By “ensuring a process was in place to respond to requests for erasure without undue delay and within one month of receipt.”  You can find more information about how to comply with requests for erasure from the ICO here.  8. AOK (Health Insurance) — €1.24 million ($1.5 million) On June 30, the Data Protection Authority of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, imposed a €1.24 million fine on health insurance company Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse (AOK).  AOK set up contests and lotteries using its customers’ personal information — including their health insurance details. The company also used this data for direct marketing. AOK tried to get consent for this, but it ended up marketing to some users who had not consented. The regulator found that the company had sent people marketing communications without establishing a lawful basis. AOK also failed to implement proper technical and organizational privacy safeguards to ensure they only sent marketing to those who consented. How the violation(s) could have been avoided: What’s the main takeaway from the AOK case? Be very careful when sending direct marketing. If you need people’s consent, make sure you keep adequate, up-to-date records of who has consented. 9. BKR (National Credit Register) — €830,000 ($973,000) On July 6, the Dutch Data Protection Authority fined the Bureau Krediet Registration (‘BKR’) €830,000 for charging individuals to access their personal information digitally. BKR allowed customers to access their personal information for free on paper, but only once per year. BKR is appealing the fine. How the violation(s) could have been avoided: BKR shouldn’t have been charging individuals to access their personal information, and they shouldn’t have been imposing a once-per-year limit. The GDPR is clear — you may only charge for access to personal information, or refuse access, if a person’s request is “manifestly unfounded or excessive.” 10. Iliad Italia — €800,000 ($976,000) On July 13, the Italian Data Protection Authority fined telecoms company Iliad Italia €800,000 for processing its users’ personal information unlawfully in numerous ways. One issue was Iliad’s collection of consent for its marketing activities, which the regulator found had been “bundled” with an acknowledgment of the company’s terms and conditions. Iliad also failed to store its users’ communications data securely. How the violation(s) could have been avoided: Consent under the GDPR is defined very narrowly. If you’re going to ask for a person’s consent, you must make it specific to a particular activity. Don’t “bundle” your consent requests — for example, by asking people to agree to marketing and sign a contract using one tickbox. Data security is one of the cornerstones of the GDPR. Iliad appears to have failed to implement proper access controls on its users’ personal information. You must ensure that personal information is only accessible on a “need to know” basis. 11. Unknown – €725,000 ($821,600) In April, the Dutch Data Protection Authority handed out its largest fine to date to a so-far unknown company for unlawfully using employees’ fingerprint scans for its attendance and timekeeping records. The violation took place over the course of 10 months. Note: Under the GDPR, biometric data like fingerprints are classified as sensitive personal data and it is subject to more stringent protections.  How the violation(s) could have been avoided: The company should have had a valid, lawful reason to collect employees’ fingerprints. They should have also had technical measures in place to process the data and a clear process for deleting the data. 
What else can organizations be fined for under GDPR?  While the biggest fines so far in 2020 involve marketing activities, failure to remove personal data when requested by EU citizens, and unlawfully requiring employees to have their biometric data recorded, there are a number of ways in which a breach can occur.  In fact, so far this year, misdirected emails have been the primary cause of data loss reported to the ICO. But, how do you prevent an accident? By focusing on people rather than systems and networks. How does Tessian help organizations stay GDPR compliant?
Powered by machine learning, Tessian’s Human Layer Security technology understands human behavior and relationships, enabling it to automatically detect and prevent anomalous and dangerous activity, including misdirected emails. Tessian also detects and prevents spear phishing attacks and data exfiltration attempts on email.  Importantly, though, Tessian doesn’t just prevent breaches. Tessian’s key features – which are both proactive and reactive – align with the GDPR requirement “to implement appropriate technical and organizational measures together with a process for regularly testing, assessing and evaluating the effectiveness of those measures to ensure the security of processing” (Article 32). To learn more about how Tessian helps with GDPR compliance, you can read our customer stories or book a demo. Or, for information about other data privacy legislation, check out our compliance hub. 
Data Exfiltration DLP Human Layer Security Spear Phishing
7 Concerns IT Leaders Have About Permanent Remote Working
By Laura Brooks
14 October 2020
According to Tessian research, 75% of IT leaders and 89% of employees believe the future of work will be “remote” or “hybrid” – a combination of working in the office and remotely.  This will have a significant impact on companies’ IT departments, who will be under pressure to deliver a seamless experience and create strategies that empower employees to work remotely and securely. In fact, 85% of IT leaders think they and their team will be under more pressure if their organization were to adopt a permanent remote working structure.  In this blog, we look at their top 7 concerns and explain how to overcome them.  1. Employee wellbeing Half of IT leaders’ are worried about staff’s wellbeing when they work remotely – making it the top concern among IT professionals.  Remote work can be incredibly stressful for employees. A survey by online employment platform Monster reported that over two-thirds of U.S. workers have experienced burnout symptoms while working from home. Why? Because people are more distracted, they’re taking less time off work, and they’re working longer hours. 61% of employees in another Tessian report said a culture of presenteeism in their organization makes them work longer hours than they need to.  The problem is that when people are stressed, tired and distracted, they make more mistakes that could compromise cybersecurity. In fact, 46% of employees say make more mistakes when they feel burned out.  IT professionals must recognize the correlation between employee wellbeing, their productivity, and security if they want to keep data and systems safe in a remote work world. Lead with empathy and find ways to prevent stressed and distracted employees from making costly cybersecurity mistakes.  2.Unsafe data practices 46% of IT leaders are also worried about employees practicing unsafe cybersecurity behaviors.  Their concerns are valid. A report published by Tessian in May 2020 revealed that 48% of employees feel they can get away with riskier cybersecurity behaviors when working from home, namely because they are working from unfamiliar devices and because they aren’t being watched by IT teams. A further 54% said they’ll find a workaround if security software or policies prevent them from doing their job. Educating employees on safe cybersecurity practices is a necessary first step. However, only 57% of companies implemented additional training at the start of the remote working period in March 2020. This isn’t trivial; businesses must continually educate staff on safe data practices because cybersecurity is rarely at the front of mind for every employee.  Businesses should also ensure that security solutions or policies do not stand in the way of people getting their jobs done. Workers will find the easiest or most convenient path, and this can often involve skirting around security rules. Security should, therefore, be as flexible as people’s working practices in order to mitigate unsafe behaviors online.
3. More data breaches Half of organizations we surveyed said they experienced a data breach or security incident between March and July 2020 – the period in which mandatory remote work arrangements were enforced. Consequently, 40% of IT leaders are worried their company will experience more data breaches if people continue to work remotely.  The causes of these data breaches included phishing attacks (49%), malware (45%) and malicious insider attacks (43%). In addition, 78% of IT leaders said they think their organization is at greater risk of insider threats when staff work from home.  To prevent data breaches caused by insider threats – and other threats caused by human error – IT teams need greater visibility into their riskiest and most at-risk employees. Only by understanding employees’ behaviors, can businesses tailor policies and training to prevent people’s actions from compromising company security and breaching sensitive data.  4. More phishing attacks Half of the security incidents reported between March-July 2020 were caused by successful phishing attacks – making phishing the top attack vector during this period of remote working.  Of the 78% of remote workers that received phishing emails while working on their personal devices, an overwhelming 68% clicked a link or downloaded an attachment from the malicious messages they received. It’s not surprising, then, that 82% of IT leaders think their organization is at greater risk of phishing attacks when people work remotely.  But why is phishing a greater risk for remote workers?  Because it is not uncommon for an employee to receive information about a new software update for a video conferencing app, or an email from a healthcare organization providing tips on how to stay safe, or a request from a supplier asking them to update payment details.  In fact, 43% of IT professionals said their staff had received phishing emails with hackers impersonating software brands, while 34% said they’d received emails from cybercriminals pretending to be an external supplier.  If the sender’s email domain looks legitimate and if hackers have used the correct logos in the body of the email, there’s very little reason why an employee would suspect they were the target of a scam. And, when working remotely, employees can’t easily verify the email with a colleague. They may, then, click the link to “join the meeting”, download the “new update” or share account credentials. To learn more about how to spot a spear phishing email, read our blog here.
5. The IT team’s bandwidth With organizations facing the threat of more data breaches and security incidents caused by unsafe cybersecurity behaviors, over a third (34%) of IT leaders worry that their teams will be stretched too far in terms of time and resource.  Security solutions powered by machine learning can help alleviate the strain. Solutions like Tessian use machine learning algorithms to understand human behaviors in order to automatically detect and prevent threats caused by human error – such as accidental data loss, data exfiltration or phishing attacks. When a potential threat is detected, the individual is alerted in real-time and a record of the incident is logged in a simple and accessible dashboard. IT professionals no longer have to spend hours manually looking back through logs to find incidents – the proverbial ‘needle in a haystack’.  When you consider that 55% of IT teams spend more time navigating manual processes than responding to vulnerabilities, finding ways to take away the manual, labor-intensive tasks will be critical in freeing up IT professionals’ time.  6. An increase to IT leaders’ workload In addition to concerns over their teams’ workloads increasing, IT leaders also fear they’ll face even longer to-do lists in a hybrid or remote working world. Why? To name a few: The majority of IT leaders will be implementing new BYOD policies, additional training programs, upgrades to endpoint protection as well as new VPNs in order to address employees’ expectations and safety.  They have to overcome challenges like data loss prevention (DLP), something 84% of IT leaders say is more difficult in distributed workforces.  They have to address and mitigate more security risks such as employees bringing infected devices or documents into the office, potentially compromising the company’s entire network.  According to Nominet’s 2020 report – The CISO Stress Report: Life Inside the Perimeter: One Year On – 88% of CISOs are moderately or tremendously stressed. What’s more, 95% work more than their contracted hours amounting to an extra 10 hours per week, on average.  As the pressure increases, businesses must find ways to alleviate stress and empower IT leaders to work effectively and efficiently in order to protect their company and employees.
7. Non-compliance with data protection regulations Nearly a third of IT leaders said that remote working could compromise compliance with data protection regulations.  In the last year, misdirected emails have been the number one cause of data breach incidents reported to the Information Commissioner’s Office. A previous Tessian report found that 58% of employees have sent an email to the wrong person during their career and, of these misdirected emails, nearly a fifth (17%) were sent to the wrong external party.  Their reasons? Nearly half said it was because they were tired and 41% said the error was made because they were distracted. Given that studies have shown people are feeling more fatigued and more distracted while working remotely, there is cause for concern that data breaches, caused by human error, will only increase.  Instead of expecting people to do the right thing 100% of the time while working away from the office, invest in security solutions that preempt these errors by detecting and preventing them from happening in the first place. That way, IT leaders can proactively stop sensitive information from leaving their environment, company IP stays secure, compliance standards are met, and customer trust is maintained. To find out more, read the full report – Securing the Future of Hybrid Work – here.
Data Exfiltration DLP Human Layer Security
Insider Threat Statistics You Should Know: Updated 2020
By Maddie Rosenthal
06 October 2020
Over the last two years, there’s been a 47% increase in the frequency of incidents involving Insider Threats. This includes malicious data exfiltration and accidental data loss. Why does this matter? Because these incidents cost organizations millions, are leading to breaches that expose sensitive customer, client, and company data, and are notoriously hard to prevent. In this article, we’ll explore: How often these incident are happening What motivates Insider Threats to act The financial  impact Insider Threats have on larger organizations The effectiveness of different preventive measures You can also download this infographic with the key statistics from this article. If you know what an Insider Threat is, click here to jump down the page. If not, you can check out some of these articles for a bit more background. What is an Insider Threat? Insider Threat Definition, Examples, and Solutions Insider Threat Indicators: 11 Ways to Recognize an Insider Threat Insider Threats: Types and Real-World Examples
How frequently are Insider Threat incidents happening? As we’ve said, incidents involving Insider Threats have increased by 47% since 2018. But the frequency of incidents varies industry-by-industry. Verizon’s 2020 Breach Investigations Report offers a comprehensive overview of different incidents in different industries, with a focus on patterns, actions, and assets.  They found that: The Healthcare and Manufacturing industries experience the most incidents involving  employees misusing their access privileges The Public Sector and Healthcare suffer the most from lost or stolen assets  Healthcare and Finance see the most “miscellaneous errors” (for example misdirected emails !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js");
There are also several different types of Insider Threats and the “who and why” behind these incidents can vary. According to one study: Negligent Insiders are the most common and account for 62% of all incidents.  Negligent Insiders who have their credentials stolen account for 25% of all incidents Malicious Insiders are responsible for 14% of all incidents.  !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js"); Looking at Tessian’s own platform data, Negligent Insiders may be responsible for even more incidents than most expected. On average, 800 emails are sent to the wrong person every year in companies with 1,000 employees. This is 1.6x more than IT leaders estimate.  !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js"); Malicious Insiders are likely responsible for more incidents than expected, too. Between March and July 2020, 43% of security incidents reported were caused by malicious insiders. We should expect this number to increase. Over three-quarters of IT leaders (78%) think their organization is at greater risk of Insider Threats if their company adopts a permanent hybrid working structure. Which, by the way, the majority of employees would prefer. What motivates Insider Threats to act? When it comes to the “why”, Insiders – specifically Malicious Insiders – are often motivated by money, a competitive edge, or revenge. But, according to one report, there is a range of reasons malicious Insiders act. Some just do it for fun.  !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js"); But, we don’t always know exactly “why”. For example, Tessian’s own survey data shows that 45% of employees download, save, send, or otherwise exfiltrate work-related documents before leaving a job or after being dismissed.  While we may be able to infer that they’re taking spreadsheets, contracts, or other documents to impress a future or potential employer, we can’t know for certain.  Note: Incidents like this happen the most frequently in competitive industries like Financial Services and Business, Consulting, & Management. This supports our theory.  !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js"); How much do incidents involving Insider Threats cost? The cost of Insider Threat incidents varies based on the type of incident, with incidents involving stolen credentials causing the most financial damage. But, across the board, the cost has been steadily rising. !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js"); Likewise, there are regional differences in the cost of Insider Threats, with incidents in North America costing the most and almost twice as much as those in Asia-Pacific. !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js"); But, overall, the average global cost has increased 31% over the last 2 years, from $8.76 million in 2018 to $11.45 in 2020 and the largest chunk goes towards containment, remediation, incident response, and investigation. !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js"); But, what about prevention? How effective are preventative measures? As the frequency of Insider Threat incidents continues to increase, so does investment in cybersecurity. But, what solutions are available and which solutions do security, IT, and compliance leaders trust to detect and prevent data loss within their organizations? According to Tessian’s latest report, The State of Data Loss Prevention 2020, most rely on security awareness training, followed by following company policies/procedures, and machine learning/intelligent automation. But, incidents actually happen more frequently in organizations that offer training the most often and, while the majority of employees say they understand company policies and procedures, comprehension doesn’t help prevent malicious behavior. !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js"); That’s why many organizations rely on rule-based solutions. But, those often fall short.  Not only are they admin-intensive for security teams, but they’re blunt instruments and often prevent employees from doing their jobs while also failing to prevent data loss from Insiders.  So, how can you detect incidents involving Insiders in order to prevent data loss and eliminate the cost of remediation? Machine learning. How does Tessian detect and prevent Insider Threats? Tessian turns an organization’s email data into its best defense against inbound and outbound email security threats. Powered by machine learning, our Human Layer Security technology understands human behavior and relationships, enabling it to automatically detect and prevent anomalous and dangerous activity. Tessian Enforcer detects and prevents data exfiltration attempts Tessian Guardian detects and prevents misdirected emails Tessian Defender detects and prevents spear phishing attacks Importantly, Tessian’s technology automatically updates its understanding of human behavior and evolving relationships through continuous analysis and learning of the organization’s email network. Oh, and it works silently in the background, meaning employees can do their jobs without security getting in the way.  Interested in learning more about how Tessian can help prevent Insider Threats in your organization? You can read some of our customer stories here or book a demo.
Compliance Data Exfiltration DLP
A Beginner’s Guide to Cybersecurity Frameworks
05 October 2020
As rates of cybersecurity incidents rise and data security laws become stricter, organizations must take steps to protect the information under its control. But safeguarding your company’s information can be a daunting task.  So, where do you start? You can start by implementing a cybersecurity framework. In this article, we’ll look at four of the most prevalent cybersecurity frameworks — to help you get started on your journey toward better information security.  But first, let’s define what a cybersecurity framework is. What is a cybersecurity framework?
What are the benefits of implementing a cybersecurity framework? Running a business is a time-consuming and complicated task and many business leaders – especially those without any background in cybersecurity – worry that implementing a cybersecurity framework will create extra work. And, while it does take time and effort to follow a cybersecurity framework through to completion, it’s almost certainly going to save you time, stress — and money — in the long-term. Here’s how: It will strengthen your network protection, reducing your risk of a cybersecurity attack. It will help ensure better data security practices among staff, reducing the risk of accidental data loss, such as via misdirected email. It increases awareness of cybersecurity among staff, leading to a reduced risk from social engineering attacks. It improves your reputation among consumers and business partners. Implementing a cybersecurity framework is also a fundamental way of meeting your legal obligations under data privacy laws, such as:  The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)  The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) The South Africa Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA)  Under these laws — and many others worldwide — it is necessary for businesses to maintain a reasonable level of data security. Implementing a cybersecurity framework is an excellent way to achieve this. Looking for more information about regional and industry-specific data protection laws? Visit our compliance content hub. 
What sorts of organizations should implement a cybersecurity framework? Implementing a cybersecurity framework is mandatory in some industries. For example, organizations that handle cardholder data must comply with the PCI DSS framework. However, a business of virtually any size — and in any industry — can adopt a cybersecurity framework at relatively low cost.  One way that a small business can achieve cybersecurity compliance is by choosing a flexible framework —  such as the CIS Controls or NIST Cybersecurity Framework, and prioritizing the implementation of controls according to its business needs and operating context. Now, let’s look at four of the best-known cybersecurity frameworks.
Introduction to CIS Controls The Center for Internet Security (CIS) Controls framework can help you mitigate and defend against the most basic cyberattacks.  Here are the 20 CIS Controls: Basic CIS Controls Inventory and Control of Hardware Assets Inventory and Control of Software Assets Continuous Vulnerability Management Controlled Use of Administrative Privileges Secure Configuration for Hardware and Software on Mobile Devices, Laptops, Workstations, and Servers Maintenance, Monitoring, and Analysis of Audit Logs Foundational CIS Controls Email and Web Browser Protections Malware Defenses Limitation and Control of Network Ports, Protocols, and Services Data Recovery Capabilities Secure Configuration for Network Devices, such as Firewalls, Routers, and Switches Boundary Defense Data Protection Controlled Access Based on the Need to Know Wireless Access Control Account Monitoring and Control Organizational CIS Controls Implement a Security Awareness and Training Program Application Software Security Incident Response and Management Penetration Tests and Red Team Exercises
CIS Control 13: Data Protection  To give you an idea of what the CIS controls require, we’ll take a closer look at Control 13: Data Protection. CIS Control 13 provides some practical steps to help you protect data from exfiltration and cyberattacks. At its core, Control 13 requires organizations to: Use a combination of encryption, integrity protection, and data loss prevention (DLP) methods to ensure the security of data Limit and report on data exfiltration attempts Mitigate the effects of data compromise Control 13 contains nine sub-controls. Some of these are achievable for businesses of all sizes, such as: 13.1: Maintain an Inventory of Sensitive Information 13.2: Remove Sensitive Data or Systems Not Regularly Accessed by Organization 13.6: Encrypt Mobile Device Data If your organization has “moderate” or “significant” resources, it can implement further sub-controls, such as: 13.3: Monitor and Block Unauthorized Network Traffic 13.4: Only Allow Access to Authorized Cloud Storage or Email Providers 13.5: Monitor and Detect Any Unauthorized Use of Encryption By implementing the CIS controls and sub-controls on a priority basis, businesses can implement a reasonably effective cybersecurity program.  Looking for a straightforward way to implement multiple sub-controls across several CIS controls? implement email security software. Email is the entry-point for 96% of phishing attacks.
Introduction to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (full title: Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity) is a comprehensive set of security controls and guidance for private sector organizations. Currently, at version 1.1, the framework aims to improve the general level of cybersecurity among US organizations. The framework is guidance — it’s entirely voluntary  — and it can be customized according to a company’s sector, resources, and risk profile. The framework’s “core” consists of cybersecurity activities and outcomes — written in accessible language that should be understandable to non-technical teams. (Phew!) The core activities and outcomes are sorted into five functions, which are further divided into categories. We’ve listed them below.  Identify: The “Identify” function provides the essential, foundational activities and outcomes necessary to use the framework. Outcomes categories associated with this function include: ID.AM: Asset Management ID.BE: Business Environment ID.RA: Risk Assessment Protect: The “Protect” function activities help mitigate the impact of a potential cyberattack or data breach. Protect outcome categories include: PR.AC: Identity Management and Access Control PR.AT: Awareness and Training PR.DS: Data Security Detect: The “Detect” function enables businesses to quickly detect that a cybersecurity event has occurred. Detect outcome categories include: DE.AE: Anomalies and Events  DE.CM: Security Continuous Monitoring DE.DP: Detection Processes Respond: Implementing the “Respond” function will ensure your business takes appropriate action during a cybersecurity event. Outcome categories in this function include: RS.RP: Response Planning  RS.CO: Communications  RS.AN: Analysis Recover: The “Recover” function allows an organization to return to normal functioning after a cyberattack. Recover function outcome categories include: RC.RP: Recovery Planning  RC.IM: Improvements RC.CO: Communications Each function’s categories are, in turn, divided into subcategories. For example: ID.AM (function: Identity, category: Asset Management): ID.AM-1: Physical devices and systems within the organization are inventoried ID.AM-2: Software platforms and applications within the organization are inventoried ID.AM-3: Organizational communication and data flows are mapped The subcategories all come with “informative references”, which are practical resources to help businesses achieve the outcomes.  For example, ID.AM-1 (Identify: Asset Management) includes the following references: CIS Control 1  ISO 27001:2013 Annexes A.8.1.1 and A.8.1.2 NIST Special Priority (SP) 800-53 (revision 4) CM-8 and PM-5 Introduction to ISO 27000 Series
The ISO 27000 Series (sometimes called the ISO/IEC 27000 Series) is a family of information security standards published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). The ISO 27000 Series is extensive, covering information security requirements, guidelines, and sector-specific standards. Examples of some of the published standards in the ISO 27000 Series include: ISO 27000: Information Security Management Systems — Overview and Vocabulary ISO 27003: Information Security Management System Implementation Guidance ISO 27018: Code of Practice for Protection of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) in Public Clouds Acting as PII Processors ISO 27019: Information Security for Process Control in the Energy Industry ISO 27032: Guideline for cybersecurity ISO 27033: IT network security Businesses of all sizes can implement one or more of the ISO 27000 Series standards. These are internationally recognized standards and are well-respected around the world.  While implementing ISO 27000 controls is not legally mandatory, there is an expectation of ISO-compliance in many industries and contexts. For example, for public cloud storage service providers that process personal information, achieving ISO 27018 compliance is crucial. ISO 27001 To give you a feel for ISO 27000 implementation, we’re going to take a closer look at one of the more popular standards in the series: ISO 27001, full name “Information technology — Security techniques — Information security management systems — Requirements.” ISO 20071 aims to enable businesses to establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve an information security management system (ISMS). Unlike the CIS Controls or the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, ISO 20071 is not available for free. The ISO 27001 standard consists of ten “clauses,” and an annex containing 114 controls, sorted into 14 sets. A business can prioritize its implementation of these controls according to its operational requirements. An essential part of complying with ISO 27001 is risk assessment. An ISO 27001 risk assessment can be broken down into several stages: Creating a risk assessment methodology that accounts for: Your operating context Risk criteria Risk tolerance Identifying information assets, such as: Digital documents Paper files Storage devices Mobile devices Identifying threats: Social engineering attacks, such as spear phishing Exfiltration of data by trusted employees Weak passwords leading to hacked employee accounts ISO 27001 compliance is an ongoing process that requires the commitment of employees across your whole organization. Once a company has implemented sufficient controls, it can undergo an audit and obtain ISO 27001 certification. Tessian is ISO 27001 certified. You can read more about your integrations, compatibility, and partnerships here. 
Introduction to PCI DSS The PCI DSS applies to all organizations that accept, transmit, or store information associated with payment cards (known as “merchants”). The PCI DSS sits alongside the PCI PTS (for manufacturers) and the PCI PA-DSS (for software developers). Unlike the other frameworks we’ve looked at, the PCI DSS is mandatory for any business that qualifies as a merchant. The Payment Card Industry Council enforces PCI DSS compliance, and — in some jurisdictions — it is incorporated into law. The framework’s requirements differ according to how many Visa transactions a merchant processes per year. There are four levels of PCI DSS requirements: Level 1: Any merchant that:  Processes more than 6 million Visa transactions per year, or Is determined by Visa as needing to meet level 1 requirements Level 2: Any merchant that processes 1-6 million Visa transactions per year Level 3: Merchants that process 20,000-1 million eCommerce Visa transactions per year Level 4: Any merchant that: Processes fewer than 20,000 Visa transactions per year, or Processes fewer than 1 million non-eCommerce Visa transactions per year As you can see, eCommerce merchants have slightly stricter requirements due to the risks of transacting online.  If a merchant suffers a data breach, it might be required to move up a level to continue making card transactions. This is one of many reasons you should take a “security-first” approach and implement as many cybersecurity controls as your budget allows. The PCI DSS consists of 12 requirements, which can be summarized as: Use a firewall Change default passwords and other security parameters Protect cardholder data in storage Encrypt cardholder in transit Implement and update antivirus software  Ensure systems and applications are secure Restrict access to cardholder data Assign unique user IDs  Maintain physical safeguards over cardholder data Monitor access to cardholder data and network resources  Test security systems  Maintain an information security policy In fewer words: Merchants must protect cardholder data from internal and external threats.  How can Tessian help with cybersecurity framework implementation? As we’ve seen, all cybersecurity frameworks require businesses to protect the information in their control from threats such as: Social engineering attacks  Accidental data loss Insider threats Across three solutions, Tessian detects and prevents email-based cybersecurity threats. Why email? Read more about why email is the threat vector cybersecurity leaders are most concerned about on our blog.  You can also learn why rule-based DLP solutions are failing and why the world’s top organizations (in some of the most regulated industries) trust Tessian.
Data Exfiltration DLP Human Layer Security
7 Examples of Data Breaches Caused By Misdirected Emails
By Maddie Rosenthal
29 September 2020
While phishing, ransomware, and brute force attacks tend to make headlines, misdirected emails (emails sent to the wrong person) are actually a much bigger problem. In fact, a report from the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) attributed 266 data breaches to this perennial issue… and that’s just between January-March of 2020. This number has no doubt increased as people around the world have been forced to work remotely; Tessian saw a 129% increase in email traffic when employees transitioned from office to home. More emails = more mistakes. Are you surprised? Most people are. That’s why we’ve rounded up this list of 7 real-world (recent) examples of data breaches caused by misdirected emails. And, if you skip down to the bottom, you’ll see how you can prevent misdirected emails (and breaches!) in your organization.  If you’re looking for a bit more background, check out these two articles: Behind the “Fat Finger”: All You Need to Know About Misdirected Emails  Consequences of Sending an Email to the Wrong Person 7 examples of data breaches caused by misdirected emails  Before we dive into the who, what, and how of these examples, it’s important to note that these incidents – and those reported to regulatory bodies like the ICO – are just the tip of the iceberg.  The truth is, most employees who fire off emails to the wrong people never let their IT or security teams know. That means many security leaders underestimate the frequency (and impact) of this easy-to-make mistake. How do we know? We asked them! (We also analyzed Tessian platform data.) Here’s what we found out: 58% of employees say they’ve sent an email to the wrong person at work At least 800 misdirected emails are sent every year in organizations with 1,000 employees IT leaders working at organizations with 1,000+ employees estimate that just 480 emails are sent to the wrong person every year 1.6x more misdirected emails are sent than IT leaders expect 43% of employees say they’ve made a mistake at work that comprised cybersecurity You can find more insights in The Psychology of Human Error and The State of Data Loss Prevention 2020. Now, on to the real-world examples! You’ll find the most recent examples listed first. Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade  leaked 1,000 citizens’ email addresses On September 30, 2020, Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) announced that the personal details of over 1,000 citizens were exposed after an employee failed to use BCC. So, who were the citizens Australians who have been stuck in other countries since inbound flights have been limited (even rationed) since the outbreak of COVID-19. The plan was to increase entry quotas and start an emergency loans scheme for those in dire need. Those who had their email addresses exposed were among the potential recipients of the loan. Immediately after the email was sent, employees at DFAT tried to recall the email, and event requested that recipients delete the email from their IT system and “refrain from any further forwarding of the email to protect the privacy of the individuals concerned.” Serco exposes contact traces’ data in email error  In May 2020, an employee at Serco, a business services and outsourcing company, accidentally cc’d instead of bcc’ing almost 300 email addresses. Harmless, right? Unfortunately not.  The email addresses – which are considered personal data – belonged to newly recruited COVID-19 contact tracers. While a Serco spokesperson has apologized and announced that they would review and update their processes, the incident nonetheless has put confidentiality at risk and could leave the firm under investigation with the ICO.  Sonos accidentally exposes the email addresses of hundreds of customers in email blunder  In January 2020, 450+ email addresses were exposed after they were (similar to the example above) cc’d rather than bcc’d.  Here’s what happened: A Sonos employee was replying to customers’ complaints. Instead of putting all the email in BCC, they were CC’d, meaning that every customer who received the email could see the personal email addresses of everyone else on the list.  The incident was reported to the ICO and is subject to potential fines.
Gender identity clinic leaks patient email addresses In September 2019, a gender identity clinic in London exposed the details of close to 2,000 people on its email list after an employee cc’d recipients instead of bcc’ing them. Two separate emails were sent, with about 900 people cc’d on each.  While email addresses on their own are considered personal information, it’s important to bear in mind the nature of the clinic. As one patient pointed out, “It could out someone, especially as this place treats people who are transgender.”  The incident was reported to the ICO who is currently assessing the information provided. But, a similar incident may offer a glimpse of what’s to come.  In 2016, the email addresses of 800 patients who attended HIV clinics were leaked because they were – again – cc’d instead of bcc’d. An NHS Trust was £180,000. Bear in mind, this fine was issued before the introduction of GDPR. University mistakenly emails 430 acceptance letters, blames “human error” In January 2019, The University of South Florida St. Petersburg sent nearly 700 acceptance emails to applicants. The problem? Only 250 of those students had actually been accepted. The other 400+ hadn’t. While this isn’t considered a breach (because no personal data was exposed) it does go to show that fat fingering an email can have a number of consequences.  In this case, the university’s reputation was damaged, hundreds of students were left confused and disappointed, and the employees responsible for the mistake likely suffered red-faced embarrassment on top of other, more formal ramifications. The investigation and remediation of the incident also will have taken up plenty of time and resources.  Union watchdog accidentally leaked secret emails from confidential whistleblower In January 2019, an official at Australia’s Registered Organisations Commission (ROC) accidentally leaked confidential information, including the identity of a whistleblower. How? The employee entered an incorrect character when sending an email. It was then forwarded to someone with the same last name – but different first initial –  as the intended recipient.  The next day, the ROC notified the whistleblower whose identity was compromised and disclosed the mistake to the Office of the Australian Information commissions as a potential privacy breach. Major Health System Accidentally Shares Patient Information Due to Third-Party Software for the Second Time This Year In May 2018 Dignity Health – a major health system headquartered in San Francisco that operates 39 hospitals and 400 care centers around the west coast – reported a breach that affected 55,947 patients to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  So, how did it happen? Dignity says the problem originated from a sorting error in an email list that had been formatted by one of its vendors. The error resulted in Dignity sending emails to the wrong patients, with the wrong names. Because Dignity is a health system, these emails also often contained the patient’s doctor’s name. That means PII and Protect health information (PHI) was exposed. 
Prevent misdirected emails (and breaches) with Tessian Guardian Regardless of your region or industry, protecting customer, client, and company information is essential. But, to err is human. So how do you prevent misdirected emails? With machine learning.  Tessian turns an organization’s email data into its best defense against human error on email. Our Human Layer Security technology understands human behavior and relationships and automatically detects and prevents emails from being sent to the wrong person. Yep, this includes typos, accidental “reply alls” and cc’ing instead of bcc’ing.  Interested in learning more about how Tessian can help prevent accidental data loss and data exfiltration in your organization? You can read some of our customer stories here or book a demo.
Compliance Data Exfiltration DLP Spear Phishing
Compliance in the Legal Sector: Laws & How to Comply
16 September 2020
Thanks to the digital transformation and increasingly strict data security obligations, law firms’ business priorities are changing. Today, data protection, transparency, and privacy are top-of-mind.  It makes sense.  Keep reading to find out… Why the legal sector is bound to such strict compliance standards Which regulations govern law firms How cybersecurity can help ensure compliance Interested in learning more about regional compliance standards or those that impact other industries? Check out our Compliance Hub to find articles, tips, guides, and more or download our CEO’s Guide to Data Protection and Compliance to learn more about how cybersecurity enables business and drives revenue. 
Why is the legal sector bound to strict compliance standards? Lawyers’ hard drives, email accounts, and smartphones can contain anything from sensitive intellectual property and trade secrets to the Personally Identifiable Information (PII) of clients.  Unfortunately, hackers and cybercriminals are all too aware of this. It’s no surprise, then, that the legal sector is amongst the most targeted by social engineering attacks like spear phishing. Ransomware is a big problem, too. In fact, just a few months ago, Grubman Shire Meiselas & Sacks, a prominent media law firm, had its client information compromised.  Those behind the attack later threatened to auction some of these files concerning major celebrities for as much as $1.5 million unless the firm paid a $42 million ransom.  But, it’s not just inbound attacks that law firms have to worry about. Because the legal sector is highly competitive, incidents involving Insider Threats are a concern, too.  96% of IT leaders working in the legal sector say they’re worried that someone within the organization will cause a breach, either accidentally (via a misdirected email, for example) or maliciously.  The regulations governing law firms When it comes to data protection and privacy, the legal sector is subject to a relatively strict regulatory framework both under the law and rules imposed by professional bodies. Depending on where a firm is based and what its practice areas are, it can be subject to several stringent laws and regulations. This is especially true for firms operating in major markets like the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union. In this article, we’ll focus on some of the more general regulations and standards that all firms operating in these markets are expected to abide by. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) When the GDPR was introduced in 2018, it represented the largest change to data protection legislation in almost two decades. It also contains some of the most thorough compliance obligations for law firms and indeed any other entity that collects, stores, and processes data. The GDPR has been designed to help and guide organizations with a legitimate business interest as to how personal data should be handled and gives regulators the power to impose large fines on firms that aren’t compliant.  You can read more about the largest GDPR fines (so far) in 2020 on our blog. What is the GDPR’s purpose? The GDPR was introduced amid growing concerns surrounding the safety of personal data and the need to protect it from hackers, cybercrime, Insider Threats, unethical use, and the growing attack surface.  Essentially, it gives citizens full and complete control of their data, subject to some restrictions (for example, where data must be held by firms by law).  What is the scope of the GDPR? The legislation regulates the use of ‘personal data’ and applies to all organizations located within the EU, as well as organizations outside the EU who offer their goods or services to EU citizens. It also applies to organizations that hold data pertaining to EU citizens, regardless of their location.  What should law firms know about the GDPR? The main part of the GDPR that law firms should be paying attention to is Article 5.  This sets out the principles relating to the collection and processing of personal data. The six key principles are that personal data: Should be processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner; Should only be collected for legitimate purposes; Should be limited to what’s necessary in relation to the purpose(s) it’s processed; Must be accurate and kept up to date, with any inaccurate erased or rectified; Should be held for longer than is necessary for its purposes*; and Should be held with adequate security against theft, loss, and/or damage.  The GDPR also gives your clients the right to ask for their data to be removed (‘right of erasure’) without the need for any outside authorization. Note: Data can only be kept contrary to a client’s wishes to ensure compliance with other regulations.  What should a firm do in the event of a breach? Before GDPR, law firms could follow their own protocols when dealing with a data breach. But now, the GDPR forces firms to report any data breaches, no matter how big or small they are, to the relevant regulatory authority within 72 hours. In the UK, for example, the regulatory authority is the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO):  The notification must: Contain relevant details regarding the nature of the breach; The approximate number of people impacted; and Contact details of the firm’s Data Protection Officer (DPO).  Clients who have had their personal data compromised must also be notified of the breach, the potential outcome, and any remediation “without undue delays”.  It’s important to note that breaches aren’t always the results of malicious activity by an Insider Threat or hacker outside the organization. Even accidents can result in breaches. In fact, misdirected emails (emails sent to the wrong person) has consistently been one of the most frequently reported incidents to the ICO.  That’s why it’s essential law firms (and other organizations) have safeguards in place to prevent mistakes like these from happening. Looking for a solution? Tessian Guardian prevents misdirected emails in some of the world’s most prestigious law firms, including Dentons, Hill Dickinson, and Travers Smith What are the penalties for non-compliance? Financial penalties imposed for GDPR violations can be harsh, and they often are; regulatory authorities are keen to highlight just how important the GDPR is and how seriously it should be taken. Fines for non-compliance can be as high as 4% of annual global turnover or €20 million—whichever is higher. American Bar Association Rule 1.6 Rule 1.6 governs the confidentiality of client information. It states, “A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation of a client.” Simply put, lawyers must make efforts to protect the data of their clients.  Two years ago, the American Bar Association issued new guidance in the form of Formal Opinion 483. This covers the importance of data protection and how firms should act when, not if, a security breach happens. This wording demonstrates that the ABA recognizes that breaches are part and parcel of firms operating in the modern world, and the statistics confirm this. 
In essence, Formal Opinion 483 states:  Lawyers have a duty of competence in implementing adequate security measures regarding technology. Lawyers must reasonably and continuously assess their systems, operating procedures, and plans for mitigating a breach. In the event of a suspected or confirmed breach, lawyers must take steps to stop the attack and prevent any further loss of data. When a breach is detected and confirmed, lawyers must inform their clients in a timely manner and with enough information for clients to make informed decisions.  The bottom line: law firms must protect data with cybersecurity. Solicitors’ Regulation Authority Code of Conduct In the UK, solicitors are obliged under the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA) Code of Conduct to maintain effective systems and mitigate risks to client confidentiality and client money. Solicitors are also obliged to ensure systems comply more broadly with the SRA’s other regulatory arrangements.  The SRA says that, although being hacked or falling victim to a data breach is not necessarily a failure to meet these requirements, firms should take proportionate steps to protect themselves and their clients while retaining the advantages of advanced IT.  Where a report of cybercrime (note: crime, not a loss that takes place due to negligence) is received, the SRA takes a constructive approach in dealing with the firm, especially if the firm:  Is proactive and immediately notifies the SRA. Has taken steps to inform the client and as a minimum make good any loss. Shows they are taking steps to improve their systems and processes to reduce the risk of a similar incident happening again.  That means that, under the SRA’s Code of Conduct, law firms should take steps to prevent inbound attacks like spear phishing and set-up policies and processes that ensure swift reporting.  The good news is, Tessian can help with both inbound attacks and Insider Threats and has a history of successfully protecting law firms around the world from both. 
How Tessian helps law firms stay compliant Across all three of the regulations listed here, there’s one commonality: law firms are responsible for ensuring that their IT systems and processes are robust and secure enough to keep data safe and mitigate the chance of a breach taking place.  But, that’s easier said than done, especially in our dynamic and digitally connected world where threats are ever-evolving. So, where should law firms start? Email. 90% of all data breaches start on email and it’s the threat vector IT leaders are most concerned about protecting. That’s why Tessian is focused on protecting this channel. Across three solutions, Tessian detects and prevents threats using machine learning, which means it’s constantly adapting, without requiring maintenance from thinly-stretched security teams. Tessian Defender detects and prevents spear phishing Tessian Guardian detects and prevents accidental data loss via misdirected email Tessian Enforcer detects and prevents data exfiltration attempts from Insider Threats Importantly, Tessian is non-disruptive. That way, partners, lawyers, and administrators can do their jobs without security getting in the way. Tessian stops threats, not business.  To learn more about how Tessian helps law firms like Dentons, Hill Dickinson, and Travers Smith protect data, maintain client trust, and satisfy compliance standards, talk to one of our experts. 
Data Exfiltration DLP Human Layer Security Spear Phishing
Worst Email Mistakes at Work and How to Fix Them
By Maddie Rosenthal
10 September 2020
Everyone makes mistakes at work. It could be double-booking a meeting, attaching the wrong document to an email, or misinterpreting directions from your boss. While these snafus may cause red-faced embarrassment, they generally won’t have any long-term consequences. But, what about mistakes that compromise cybersecurity? This happens more often than you might think. In fact, nearly half of employees say they’ve done it, and employees under 40 are among the most likely. !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js"); In this article, we’ll focus on email mistakes. You’ll learn: The top five email mistakes that compromise cybersecurity How frequently these incidents happen What to do if you make a mistake on email
I sent an email to the wrong person At Tessian, we call this a misdirected email. If you’ve sent one, you’re not alone. 58% of people say they’ve done it and, according to Tessian platform data, at least 800 are fired off every year in organizations with over 1,000 people. It’s also the number one security incident reported to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) under the GDPR. (More on the consequences related to data privacy below.) Why does it happen so often? Well, because it’s incredibly easy to do. It could be a simple typo (for example, sending an email to jon.do[email protected] instead of [email protected]) or it could be an incorrect suggestion from autocomplete.  What are the consequences of sending a misdirected email? While we’ve written about the consequences of sending an email to the wrong person in this article, here’s a high-level overview:  Embarrassment  Fines under compliance standards like GDPR and CCPA Lost customer trust and increased churn Job loss Revenue loss Damaged reputation
Real-world example of a misdirected email In 2019, the names of 47 claimants who were the victims of sexual abuse were leaked in an email from the program administrator after her email client auto-populated the wrong email address.  While the program administrator is maintaining that this doesn’t qualify as a data leak or breach, the recipient of the email – who worked in healthcare and understands data privacy requirements under HIPAA – continues to insist that the 47 individuals must be notified.  As of September 2020, they still haven’t been. I accidentally hit “reply all” or cc’ed someone instead of bcc’ing them Like sending a misdirected email, accidentally hitting “reply all” or cc instead of bcc are both easy mistakes to make.  What are the consequences of hitting “reply all” or cc instead of bcc? As you may have guessed, the consequences are the same as the consequences of sending a misdirected email. And, importantly, the consequences depend entirely on what information was contained in, or attached to, the email. For example, if you drafted a snarky response to a company-wide email and intended to send it to a single co-worker but ended up firing it off everyone, you’ll be embarrassed and may worry about your professional credibility.  But, if you replace that snarky response with a spreadsheet containing medical information about employees, you’ll have to report the data loss incident which could have long-term consequences. Real-world example of hitting “reply all” In 2018, an employee at the Utah Department of Corrections accidentally sent out a calendar invite for her division’s annual potluck. Harmless, right? Wrong. Instead of sending the invite to 80 people, it went to 22,000; nearly every employee in Utah government. While there were no long-term consequences (i.e., it wasn’t considered a data loss incident or breach) it does go to show how easily data can travel and land in the wrong hands.  Real-world example of cc’ing someone instead of bcc’ing them On January 21, 2020, 450 customer email addresses were inadvertently exposed after they were copied, rather than blind copied, into an email. The email was sent by an employee at speaker-maker Sonos and, while it was an accident, under GDPR, the mistake is considered a potential breach.  I fell for a phishing scam According to Tessian research, 1 in 4 employees has clicked on a phishing email. But, the odds aren’t exactly in our favor. In 2019, 22% of breaches in 2019 involved phishing…and 96% of phishing attacks start on email. (You can find more Phishing Statistics here.) Like sending an email to the wrong person, it’s easy to do, especially when we’re distracted, stressed, or tired. But, it doesn’t just come down to psychology. Phishing scams are getting harder and harder to detect as hackers use increasingly sophisticated techniques to dupe us.  !function(e,t,s,i){var n="InfogramEmbeds",o=e.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=o[0],r=/^http:/.test(e.location)?"http:":"https:";if(/^\/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=r+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var a=e.createElement("script");a.async=1,a.id=s,a.src=i,d.parentNode.insertBefore(a,d)}}(document,0,"infogram-async","//e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js"); What are the consequences of falling for a phishing scam? Given the top five “types” of data that are compromised in phishing attacks (see below), the consequences of a phishing attack are virtually limitless. Identify theft. Revenue loss. Customer churn. A wiped hardrive. But, the top five “types” of data that are compromised in a phishing attack are: Credentials (passwords, usernames, pin numbers) Personal data (name, address, email address) Internal data (sales projections, product roadmaps)  Medical (treatment information, insurance claims) Bank (account numbers, credit card information) Real-world example of a successful phishing attack In August 2020, The SANS institute – a global cybersecurity training and certifications organization – revealed that nearly 30,000 accounts of PII were compromised in a phishing attack that convinced an end-user to install a self-hiding and malicious Office 365 add-on. While no passwords or financial information were compromised and all the affected individuals have been notified, the breach goes to show that anyone – even cybersecurity experts – can fall for phishing scams. But, most phishing attacks have serious consequences. According to one report, 60% of organizations lose data. 50% have credentials or accounts compromised. Another 50% are infected with ransomware. 35% experience financial losses. I sent an unauthorized email As a part of a larger cybersecurity strategy, most organizations will have policies in place that outline what data can be moved outside the network and how it can be moved outside the network. Generally speaking, sending data to personal email accounts or third-parties is a big no-no. At Tessian, we call these emails “unauthorized” and they’re sent 38x more than IT leaders estimate. Tessian platform data shows that nearly 28,000 unauthorized emails are sent in organizations with 1,000 employees every year.  So, why do people send them? It could be well-intentioned. For example, sending a spreadsheet to your personal email address to work over the weekend. Or, it could be malicious. For example, sending trade secrets to a third-party in exchange for a job opportunity.  What are the consequences of sending an unauthorized email Whether well-intentioned or malicious, the consequences are the same: if the email contains data, it could be considered a data loss incident or even a breach. In that case, the consequences include: Lost data Lost intellectual property Revenue loss Losing customers and/or their trust Regulatory fines Damaged reputation No sensitive data involved? The consequences will depend on the organization and existing policies. But, you should (at the very least) expect a warning.  Real-world example of an unauthorized email In 2017, an employee at Boeing shared a spreadsheet with his wife in hopes that she could help solve formatting issues. While this sounds harmless, it wasn’t. The personal information of 36,000 employees was exposed, including employee ID data, places of birth, and accounting department codes. You can find more real-word examples of “Insider Threats” in this article: Insider Threats: Types And Real-World Examples How can I avoid making mistakes on email? The easiest answer is: be vigilant. Double-check who you’re sending emails to and what you’re sending. Make sure you understand your company’s policies when it comes to data. Be cautious when responding to requests for information or money.  But vigilance alone isn’t enough. To err is human and, as we said at the beginning of this article, everyone makes mistakes.  That’s why to prevent email mistakes, data loss, and successful targeted attacks, organizations need to implement email security solutions that prevent human error. That’s exactly what Tessian does. Powered by machine learning, our Human Layer Security technology understands human behavior and relationships. Tessian Guardian automatically detects and prevents misdirected emails Tessian Enforcer automatically detects and prevents data exfiltration attempts Tessian Defender automatically detects and prevents spear phishing attacks Importantly, Tessian’s technology automatically updates its understanding of human behavior and evolving relationships through continuous analysis and learning of the organization’s email network. That means it gets smarter over time to keep you protected, always.  Interested in learning more about how Tessian can help prevent email mistakes in your organization? You can read some of our customer stories here or book a demo.
Compliance Customer Stories Data Exfiltration DLP Human Layer Security Spear Phishing
18 Actionable Insights From Tessian Human Layer Security Summit
By Maddie Rosenthal
09 September 2020
In case you missed it, Tessian hosted its third (and final) Human Layer Security Summit of 2020 on September 9. This time, we welcomed over a dozen security and business leaders from the world’s top institutions to our virtual stage, including: Jeff Hancock from Stanford University David Kennedy, Co-Founder and Chief Hacking Officer at TrustedSec Merritt Baer, Principal Security Architect at AWS Rachel Beard, Principal Security Technical Architect at Salesforce  Tim Fitzgerald, CISO at Arm  Sandeep Amar, CPO at MSCI  Martyn Booth, CISO at Euromoney  Kevin Storli, Global CTO and UK CISO at PwC Elvis M. Chan, Supervisory Special Agent at the FBI  Nina Schick, Author of “Deep Fakes and the Infocalypse: What You Urgently Need to Know” Joseph Blankenship, VP Research, Security & Risk at Forrester Howard Shultz, Former CEO at Starbucks  While you can watch the full event on YouTube below, we’ve identified 18 valuable insights that security, IT, compliance, and business leaders should apply to their strategies as they round out this year and look forward to the next.
Here’s what we learned at Tessian’s most recent Human Layer Security Summit. Not sure what Human Layer Security is? Check out this guide which covers everything you need to know about this new category of protection.  1. Cybersecurity is mission-critical Security incidents – whether it’s a ransomware attack, brute force attack, or data leakage from an insider threat – have serious consequences. Not only can people lose their jobs, but businesses can lose customer trust, revenue, and momentum. While this may seem obvious to security leaders, it may not be so obvious to individual departments, teams, and stakeholders. But it’s essential that this is communicated (and re-communicated).  Why? Because a company that’s breached cannot fulfill its mission. Keep reading for insights and advice around keeping your company secure, all directly from your peers in the security community. 2. Most breaches start with people People control our most sensitive systems and data. It makes sense, then, that most data breaches start with people. But, that doesn’t mean employees are the weakest link. They’re a business’ strongest asset! So, it’s all about empowering them to make better security decisions. That’s why organizations have to adopt people-centric security solutions and strategies.
The good news is, security leaders don’t face an uphill battle when it comes to helping employees understand their responsibility when it comes to cybersecurity… 3. Yes, employees are aware of their duty to protect data Whether it’s because of compliance standards, cybersecurity headlines in mainstream media, or a larger focus on privacy and protection at work, Martyn Booth, CISO at Euromoney reminded us that most employees are actually well aware of the responsibility they bear when it comes to safeguarding data.  This is great news for security leaders. It means the average employee will be more likely to abide by policies and procedures, will pay closer attention during awareness training, and will therefore contribute to a more positive security culture company-wide. Win-win. 4. But, employees are more vulnerable to phishing scams outside of their normal office environment  While – yes – employees are more conscious of cybersecurity, the shift to remote working has also left them more vulnerable to attacks like phishing scams.  “We have three “places”: home, work, and where we have fun. When we combine two places into one, it’s difficult psychologically. When we’re at home sitting at our coffee table, we don’t have the same cues that remind us to think about security that we do in the office. This is a huge disruption,” Jeff Hancock, Professor at Stanford University explained.  Unfortunately, hackers are taking advantage of these psychological vulnerabilities. And, as David Kennedy, Co-Founder and Chief Hacking Officer at TrustedSec pointed out, this isn’t anything new. Cybercriminals have always been opportunistic in their attacks and therefore take advantage of chaos and emotional distress.  To prevent successful opportunistic attacks, he recommends that you: Reassess what the new baseline is for attacks Educate employees on what threats look like today, given recent events Identify which brands, organizations, people, and departments may be impersonated (and targeted) in relation to the pandemic But, it’s not just inbound email attacks we need to be worried about.  5. They’re more likely to make other mistakes that compromise cybersecurity, too This change to our normal environment doesn’t just affect our ability to spot phishing attacks. It also makes us more likely to make other mistakes that compromise cybersecurity. Across nearly every session, our guest speakers said they’ve seen more incidents involving human error and that security leaders should expect this trend to continue. That’s why training, policies, and technology are all essential components of any security strategy. More on this below. 6. Security awareness training has to be ongoing and ever-evolving At our first Human Layer Security Summit back in March, Mark Logsdon, Head of Cyber Assurance and Oversight at Prudential, highlighted three key flaws in security awareness training: It’s boring It’s often irrelevant It’s expensive What he said is still relevant six months on and it’s a bigger problem than ever, especially now that the perimeter has disappeared, security teams are short-handed, and individual employees are working at home and on their own devices. So, what can security leaders do?  Kevin Storli, Global CTO and UK CISO at PwC highlighted the importance of tailoring training to ensure it’s always relevant. That means that instead of just reminding employees about compliance standards and the importance of a strong password, we should also be focusing on educating employees about remote access, endpoints, and BYOD policies. But one training session isn’t enough to make security best practice really stick. These lessons have to be constantly reinforced through gamification, campaigns, and technology.  Tim Fitzgerald, CISO at Arm highlighted how Tessian’s in-the-moment warnings have helped his employees make the right decisions at the right time.  “Warnings help create that trigger in their brain. It makes them pause and gives them that extra breath before taking the next potentially unsafe step. This is especially important when they’re dealing with data or money. Tessian ensures they question what they’re doing,” he said.
7. You have to combine human policies with technical controls to ensure security  It’s clear that technology and training are both valuable. That means your best bet is to combine the two. In discussion with Ed Bishop, Tessian Co-Founder and CTO, Merritt Baer, Principal Security Architect at AWS and Rachel Beard, Principal Security Technical Architect at Salesforce, both highlighted how important it is for organizations to combine policies with technical controls. But security teams don’t have to shoulder the burden alone. When using tools like Salesforce, for example, organizations can really lean on the vendor to understand how to use the platform securely. Whether it’s 2FA, customized policies, or data encryption, many security features will be built-in.  8. But…Zero Trust security models aren’t always the answer While – yes – it’s up to security teams to ensure policies and controls are in place to safeguard data and systems, too many policies and controls could backfire. That means that “Zero Trust” security models aren’t necessarily the best way to prevent breaches.
9. Security shouldn’t distract people from their jobs  Security teams implement policies and procedures, introduce new software, and make training mandatory for good reason. But, if security becomes a distraction for employees, they won’t exercise best practice.  The truth is, they just want to do the job they were hired to do!  Top tip from the event: Whenever possible, make training and policies customized, succinct, and relevant to individual people or departments.  10. It also shouldn’t prevent them from doing their jobs  This insight goes back to the idea that “Zero Trust” security models may not be the best way forward. Why? Because, like Rachel, Merrit, Sandeep, and Martyn all pointed out: if access controls or policies prevent an employee from doing their job, they’ll find a workaround or a shortcut. But, security should stop threats, not flow. That’s why the most secure path should also be the path of least resistance. Security strategies should find a balance between the right controls and the right environment.  This, of course, is a challenge, especially when it comes to rule-based solutions. “If-then” controls are blunt instruments. Solutions powered by machine learning, on the other hand, detect and prevent threats without getting in the way. You can learn more about the limitations of traditional data loss prevention solutions in our report The State of Data Loss Prevention 2020.  11. Showing downtrending risks helps demonstrate the ROI of security solutions  Throughout the event, several speakers mentioned that preemptive controls are just as important as remediation. And it makes sense. Better to detect risky behavior before a security incident happens, especially given the time and resources required in the event of a data breach.  But tracking risky behavior is also important. That way, security leaders can clearly demonstrate the ROI of security solutions. Martyn Booth, CISO at Euromoney, explained how he uses Tessian Human Layer Security Intelligence to monitor user behavior, influence safer behavior, and track risk over time. “We record how many alerts are sent out and how employees interact with those alerts. Do they follow the acceptable use policy or not? Then, through our escalation workflows that ingest Tessian data, we can escalate or reinforce. From that, we’ve seen incidents involving data exfiltration trend downwards over time. This shows a really clear risk reduction,” he said. 12. Targeted attacks are becoming more difficult to spot and hackers are using more sophisticated techniques As we mentioned earlier, hackers take advantage of psychological vulnerabilities. But, social media has turbo-charged cybercrime, enabling cybercriminals to create more sophisticated attacks that can be directed at larger organizations. Yes, even those with strong cybersecurity. Our speakers mentioned several examples, including Garmin and Twitter. So, how do they do it? Research! LinkedIn, company websites, out-of-office messages, press releases, and news articles all provide valuable information that a hacker could use to craft a believable email. But, there are ways to limit open-source recon. See tips from David Kennedy, Co-Founder and Chief Hacking Officer at TrustedSec, below. 
13. Deepfakes are a serious concern Speaking of social media, Elvis M Chan, Supervisory Special Agent at the FBI and Nina Schick, Author of “Deep Fakes and the Infocalypse: What You Urgently Need to Know”,  took a deep dive into deepfakes. And, according to Nina, “This is not an emerging threat. This threat is here. Now.” While we tend to associate deepfakes with election security, it’s important to note that this is a threat that affects businesses, too.  In fact, Tim Fitzgerald, CISO at Arm, cited an incident in which his CEO was impersonated in a deepfake over Whatsapp. The ask? A request to move money. According to Tim, it was quite compelling.  Unfortunately, deepfakes are surprisingly easy to make and generation is outpacing detection. But, clear policies and procedures around authenticating and approving requests can ensure these scams aren’t successful. Not sure what a deepfake is? We cover everything you need to know in this article: Deepfakes: What Are They and Why Are They a Threat? 14. Supply chain attacks are, too  In conversation with Henry Treveleyan Thomas, Head of Customer Success at Tessian, Kevin Storli, Global CTO and UK CISO at PwC discussed how organizations with large supply chains are especially vulnerable to advanced impersonation attacks like spear phishing. “It’s one thing to ensure your own organization is secure. But, what about your supply chain? That’s a big focus for us: ensuring our supply chain has adequate security controls,” he said. Why is this so important? Because hackers know large organizations like PwC will have robust security strategies. So, they’ll look for vulnerabilities elsewhere to gain a foothold. That’s why strong cybersecurity can actually be a competitive differentiator and help businesses attract (and keep) more customers and clients.  15. People will generally make the right decisions if they’re given the right information 88% of data breaches start with people. But, that doesn’t mean people are careless or malicious. They’re just not security experts. That’s why it’s so important security leaders provide their employees with the right information at the right time. Both Sandeep Amar, CPO at MSCI and Tim Fitzgerald, CISO at Arm talked about this in detail.  It could be a guide on how to spot spear phishing attacks or – as we mentioned in point #6 – in-the-moment warnings that reinforce training.   Check out their sessions for more insights.  16. Success comes down to people While we’ve talked a lot about human error and psychological vulnerabilities, one thing was made clear throughout the Human Layer Security Summit. A business’s success is completely reliant on its people. And, we don’t just mean in terms of security. Howard Shultz, Former CEO at Starbucks, offered some incredible advice around leadership which we can all heed, regardless of our role. In particular, he recommended: Creating company values that really guide your organization Ensuring every single person understands how their role is tied to the goals of the organization Leading with truth, transparency, and humility
17. But people are dealing with a lot of anxiety right now Whether you’re a CEO or a CISO, you have to be empathetic towards your employees. And, the fact is, people are dealing with a lot of anxiety right now. Nearly every speaker mentioned this. We’re not just talking about the global pandemic.  We’re talking about racial and social inequality. Political unrest. New working environments. Bigger workloads. Mass lay-offs.  Joseph Blankenship, VP Research, Security & Risk at Forrester, summed it up perfectly, saying “We have an anxiety-ridden user base and an anxiety-ridden security base trying to work out how to secure these new environments. We call them users, but they’re actually human beings and they’re bringing all of that anxiety and stress to their work lives.” That means we all have to be human first. And, with all of this in mind, it’s clear that….. 18. The role of the CISO has changed  Sure, CISOs are – as the name suggests – responsible for security. But, to maintain security company-wide, initiatives have to be perfectly aligned with business objectives, and every individual department, team, and person has to understand the role they play. Kevin Storli, Global CTO and UK CISO at PwC touched on this in his session. “To be successful in implementing security change, you have to bring the larger organization along on the journey. How do you get them to believe in the mission? How do you communicate the criticality? How do you win the hearts and minds of the people? CISOs no longer live in the back office and address just tech aspects. It’s about being a leader and using security to drive value.” That’s a tall order and means that CISOs have to wear many hats. They need to be technology experts while also being laser-focused on the larger business. And, to build a strong security culture, they have to borrow tactics from HR and marketing.  The bottom line: The role of the CISO is more essential now than ever. It makes sense. Security is mission-critical, remember? If you’re looking for even more insights, make sure you watch the full event, which is available on-demand. You can also check out previous Human Layer Security Summits on YouTube.
Page